Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder
Dies sind die Kandidaten für die exzellenten Bilder. Beachte, dass es sich hierbei nicht um das Bild des Tages handelt.
Formalien
[edit]Nominierung
[edit]Leitsätze für die Nominierung
[edit]Bitte lies alle Leitsätze (Englisch) vor der Nominierung.
Dies ist eine Zusammenfassung von Kriterien, auf die du bei der Einreichung und Bewertung von Exzellenz-Kandidaten achten solltest:
- Auflösung – Fotografien mit einer Auflösung unter 2 Millionen Pixel werden in der Regel abgelehnt, außer unter „stark mildernden Umständen“. Beachte, dass ein 1600 x 1200 großes Foto 1,92 Megapixel hat und damit weniger als 2 Millionen.
- Grafiken auf Commons können auch in anderen Weisen als zur Anzeige auf einen herkömmlichen Computerbildschirm verwendet werden. Sie können auch als Ausdruck oder zur Anzeige auf hochauflösenden Bildschirmen verwendet werden. Man kann nicht vorhersagen, welche Geräte in Zukunft Anwendung finden, deshalb ist es wichtig, dass die nominierten Bilder die höchstmögliche Auflösung haben.
- Eingescannte Bilder – solange es keine offizielle Richtlinie gibt, findet man unter Help:Scannen für verschiedene Typen von Bildern Hinweise für die Vorbereitung, die hilfreich sein können.
- Fokus – jedes wichtige Objekt im Bild sollte normalerweise scharf sein.
- Vordergrund und Hintergrund – Objekte im Vorder- und Hintergrund können stören. Kontrolliere, ob etwas vor dem Motiv des Bildes wichtige Elemente verdeckt. Auch soll nichts im Hintergrund die Komposition verderben, zum Beispiel eine Straßenlampe, die über dem Kopf einer abgebildeten Person „steht“.
- Allgemeine Qualität – nominierte Bilder sollten von hoher technischer Qualität sein.
- Digitale Manipulationen betrügen nicht in jedem Fall den Betrachter. Digitale Nachbearbeitungen, um Fehler von Fotografien zu korrigieren, sind allgemein akzeptiert, vorausgesetzt, sie sind begrenzt und gut gemacht, ohne dabei betrügen zu wollen. Akzeptiert werden normalerweise Beschneiden, perspektivische Korrekturen, Schärfen und Verwischen sowie Farb- und Belichtungskorrekturen. Umfangreichere Korrekturen wie das Entfernen von störenden Hintergrundobjekten sollten in der Bildbeschreibung mit Hilfe der Vorlage {{Retouched picture}} klar beschrieben werden. Nicht oder falsch beschriebenen Manipulationen, die dazu führen, dass das Hauptmotiv falsch dargestellt wird, sind unter keinen Umständen akzeptabel.
- Wert – unser Hauptziel ist das Hervorheben der wertvollsten Bilder von allen anderen. Bilder sollten irgendwie etwas Besonderes sein. Darum sei dir bewusst, dass:
- nahezu jeder Sonnenuntergang ästhetisch ansprechend ist und die meisten keinen wesentlichen Unterschied aufweisen zu anderen,
- Nachtaufnahmen hübsch sind, aber dass man normalerweise mit Aufnahmen bei Tag mehr Details zeigen kann,
- schön nicht immer wertvoll bedeuten muss.
Auf der fachlichen Seite gibt es die Belichtung, die Komposition, die Bewegungskontrolle und die Fokustiefe zu beachten.
- Belichtung bezieht sich auf die Verschluss-Blende-Kombination, die ein Bild mit einer Tonkurve wiedergibt. Idealerweise bildet diese Tonkurve in akzeptabler Genauigkeit Schatten- und Spitzlichtbereiche im Bild ab. Dies nennt man „Belichtungsspielraum“. Bilder können im niedrigen Teil der Tonkurve (unterer Bereich), im mittleren (mittlerer Bereich) oder hohen Teil (oberer Bereich) liegen. Digitale Kameras (oder Bilder) haben einen engeren Belichtungsspielraum als Fotofilme. Fehlende Genauigkeit im Schattenbereich ist nicht unbedingt ein Nachteil. Tatsächlich kann dies ein gewünschter Effekt sein. Eingebrannte Spitzenlichter sind dagegen ein störendes Element.
- Komposition bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Elemente im Bild selbst. Die „Drittel-Regel“ ist ein guter Grundsatz für die Komposition und ein Erbe der Gemäldemalerei. Die Idee ist, das Bild mit jeweils zwei horizontalen und zwei vertikalen Linien zu teilen. Dadurch wird das Bild in horizontale und vertikale Drittel geteilt. Das Motiv im Zentrum des Bildes zu platzieren, ist oft weniger interessant, als es auf einem der vier Schnittpunkte der horizontalen und vertikalen Schnittlinien zu platzieren. Der Horizont sollte eigentlich niemals in der Mitte des Bildes liegen, wo er das Bild in zwei Hälften „teilt“. Die obere oder untere horizontale Linie ist oft eine gute Wahl. Der Hauptgedanke ist, den Raum zu nutzen, um ein dynamisches Bild zu schaffen.
- Bewegungskontrolle bezieht sich auf die Weise, wie die Bewegung im Bild abgebildet wird. Die Bewegung kann stillstehend oder verschwommen sein. Weder das eine noch das andere ist besser; es kommt auf den Zweck der Aufnahme an. Bewegung ist relativ innerhalb der Objekte des Bildes. Zum Beispiel vermittelt uns das Fotografieren eines relativ zum Hintergrund stillstehenden Rennwagens kein Gefühl für das Tempo oder die Bewegung. Also zwingt uns die Fototechnik, das Motiv stillstehend vor verschwommenem Hintergrund abzubilden, wodurch ein Gefühl für die Bewegung entsteht. Dies nennt man „Schwenken“. Andererseits kann eine Aufnahme eines im Vergleich zur Umgebung stillstehenden Basketballspielers während eines hohen Sprunges das „Unnatürliche“ der Natur dieser Pose sichtbar machen.
- Fokustiefe (DOF – Depth Of Field) bezieht sich auf den Fokusbereich vor und hinter dem Hauptmotiv. Die Fokustiefe wird abhängig von den spezifischen Erfordernissen jedes Bildes gewählt. Große oder kleine Fokustiefe kann auf die eine oder andere Weise die Qualität der Aufnahme vergrößern oder schmälern. Geringe Fokustiefe kann die Aufmerksamkeit auf das Hauptmotiv des Bildes lenken, das Hauptmotiv erscheint dadurch von seiner Umgebung gelöst. Hohe Fokustiefe bringt Abstände zwischen Motiven zur Geltung. Objektive mit kurzer Brennweite (Weitwinkel) ergeben eine hohe Fokustiefe, umgekehrt haben Objektive mit langer Brennweite (Teleobjektive) eine flache Fokustiefe. Kleine Blendenöffnungen bringen große Fokustiefe, und umgekehrt große Blendenöffnungen bringen flache Fokustiefen.
Bei den grafischen Elementen gibt es Form, Volumen, Farbe, Struktur, Perspektive, Balance, Proportion, usw.
- Form bezieht sich auf den Umriss des Hauptmotivs.
- Volumen bezieht sich die dreidimensionale Qualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenlicht herausgebildet. Im Gegenteil zum allgemeinen Glauben ist Frontbeleuchtung nicht die beste Wahl. Frontbeleuchtung lässt das Motiv abflachen. Das beste Tageslicht hat man am frühen Morgen oder nachmittags.
- Farbe ist wichtig. Übersättigte Farben sind nicht gut.
- Struktur bezieht sich auf die Oberflächenqualität des Motivs. Diese wird durch Seitenbeleuchtung verbessert.
- Perspektive bezieht sich auf den „Grad“ zusammen mit Linien, die in einen Fluchtpunkt innerhalb oder außerhalb des Bildes enden.
- Balance bezieht sich auf die Anordnung der Motive innerhalb des Bildes, die entweder das scheinbar gleiche Gewicht haben oder schwerer auf einer Seite erscheinen.
- Proportion bezieht sich auf die Größenunterschiede der Objekte im Bild. Normalerweise tendieren wir dazu, kleine Gegenstände klein im Vergleich zu anderen darzustellen. Eine gute Methode kann aber sein, kleine Objekte groß im Gegensatz zu wirklichen Größenverhältnissen abzubilden. Zum Beispiel: Eine kleine Blume überwiegt gegenüber einem großen Berg. Dies nennt man Maßstabsinversion.
- Nicht alle Elemente müssen berücksichtigt werden. Einige Fotografien können anhand individueller Eigenschaften beurteilt werden. Für ein Bild kann die Farbe oder die Struktur wichtig sein, oder Farbe und Strukur, usw.
- Symbolische Aussage oder Relevanz…. Der Meinungskrieg kann hier beginnen…. Ein schlechtes Bild von einem sehr schwierigen Motiv ist ein besseres Bild als ein gutes Bild von einem gewöhnlichen Motiv. Ein gutes Bild von einem schwierigen Motiv ist ein außergewöhnliches Foto.
- Bilder können kulturell beeinflusst sein durch den Fotografen und/oder den Betrachter. Die Bedeutung des Bildes sollte vor dem kulturellen Hintergrund des Bildes beurteilt werden, nicht durch den kulturellen Hintergrund des Betrachters. Ein Bild „spricht“ zu Menschen und hat die Möglichkeit, Emotionen auszulösen, wie zum Beispiel Zärtlichkeit, Zorn, Ablehnung, Heiterkeit, Traurigkeit usw. Gute Fotografen sind nicht darauf beschränkt, gefällige Emotionen zu provozieren.
Um die Chancen für einen Erfolg deiner Nominierung zu erhöhen, lies vor der Nominierung alle Leitsätze.
Eine neue Nominierung aufstellen
[edit]Wenn du glaubst, ein Bild mit passender Bildbeschreibung und Lizenz gefunden oder geschaffen zu haben, das als wertvoll erachtet werden könnte, folge der anschließenden Anleitung.
Schritt 1: Kopiere den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:), hinter den schon im Feld stehenden Text, zum Beispiel „Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG“. Danach klicke auf die Schaltfäche mit der Aufschrift „neue Nominierung aufstellen“.
Schritt 2: Folge den Anweisungen der geöffneten Seite, und sichere sie.
Schritt 3: Füge manuell einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Kandidatenliste ein:
Hier klicken, und füge folgende Zeile OBEN bei der Nominierungslist ein:
- {{Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:DEIN-BILD-DATEINAME.JPG}}
Abstimmung
[edit]Du kannst folgende Vorlagen benutzen:
- {{Support}} ( Support) (Stimme zur Unterstützung des Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Oppose}} ( Oppose) (Stimme gegen den Exzellenz-Status),
- {{Neutral}} ( Neutral) (neutrale Meinung, keine Stimme),
- {{Comment}} ( Comment) (es folgt ein Kommentar, keine Stimme),
- {{Info}} ( Info) (es folgen Informationen, keine Stimme),
- {{Question}} ( Question) (es folgt eine Frage, keine Stimme)
Du kannst angeben, dass das Bild keine Chance für eine erfogreiche Kandidatur hat. Benutze die Vorlage {{FPX|reason}}, wobei reason angibt, warum das nominierte Bild klar unakzeptabel für die exzellenten Bilder ist.
Weitere Vorlagen gibt es hier.
Bitte füge ein paar Worte an, warum dir das Bild gefällt oder nicht gefällt, insbesondere wenn du dagegen stimmst. Bitte denke auch daran, zu unterschreiben (~~~~). Anonyme Stimmen sind nicht zugelassen.
Abwahlkandidaten der exzellenten Bilder aufstellen
[edit]Mit der Zeit ändern sich die Standards für die Exzellenten Bilder. Es kann entschieden werden, dass Bilder, die vorher „gut genug“ für die Exzellenten waren, es nicht mehr sind. Dies ist zum Aufstellen eines Bildes, welches deiner Meinung nach es nicht mehr verdient, exzellent zu sein. Dazu wähle mit
- {{Keep}} Keep (das Bild verdient es immer noch, als exzellent zu gelten) oder mit
- {{Delist}} Delist (das Bild verdient es nicht mehr, als exzellent zu gelten).
Wenn du denkst, dass ein Bild nicht mehr den Exzellenz-Kriterien entspricht, kannst du es für die Abwahl nominieren, indem du den Bildnamen in dieses Textfeld (einschließlich des Zusatzes Image:) hinter den bereits stehenden Text im Feld kopierst:
In der eben erstellten neuen Seite für die Nomination des Abwahlkandidaten solltest du einfügen:
- Informationen über den Ursprung des Bildes (Ersteller, Uploader),
- Einen Link zur originalen Exzellenz-Kandidatur-Seite (es erscheint unter „Links“ auf der Beschreibungsseite),
- Deine Begründung für die Nominierung und dein Benutzername.
Danach musst du einen Link zu der erstellten Seite oben auf der Seite mit der Liste der Abwahlkandidaten manuell einfügen.
Richtlinien für Exzellenz-Kandidaten
[edit]Allgemeine Regeln
[edit]- Nach dem Ende des Abstimmungs-Zeitraumes wird das Ergebnis am Tag 10 nach der Nominierung festgestellt (im Zeitplan weiter unten gezeigt). Also dauert der Abstimmungs-Zeitraum 9 Tage, plus die Stunden bis zum Ende von Tag 9. Stimmen, die an Tag 10 oder danach abgeben wurden, werden nicht gezählt.
- Nominierungen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Mitwirken bei Diskussionen von anonymen Mitwirkenden sind erwünscht.
- Nur Nutzer mit einem commons-account, der mindestens 10 Tage alt ist und 50 Beiträge hat, können wählen. Ausnahme: Die eigene Nominierung kann gewählt werden, unabhängig von Alter und Beiträge.
- Die Nominierung zählt nicht als Stimme. Unterstützung muss explizit angegeben werden.
- Nominierungen können vom Einsteller jederzeit zurückgezogen werden. Dies geschieht einfach durch das Schreiben von „I withdraw my nomination“ (eng. Ich ziehe meine Nominierung zurück)
oder durch Hinzufügen von{{withdraw}} ~~~~
. - Denke daran, das Ziel von Wikimedia Commons ist es, einen zentralen Speicher für freie Bilder, genutzt von allen Wikimedia-Projekten, bereitzustellen, einschließlich für mögliche zukünftige Projekte. Dies ist nicht einfach ein Speicher für Wikipedia-Bilder, deshalb sollten hier die Bilder nicht danach beurteilt werden, ob sie zu diesem Projekt passen.
- Bilder können vorzeitig am Tag 5 (fünfter Tag nach der Nominierung) von der Abstimmungsliste genommen werden („Regel des 5. Tages“):
- Wenn sie keine Unterstützung erhalten, die Einsteller nicht mitgezählt.
- Wenn sie 10 oder mehr Pro und kein Kontra erhalten haben.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPX}} markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden, vorausgesetzt, das Bild hat außer von den Einstellern keine positiven Stimmen (Unterstützung) erhalten.
- Bilder, welche durch die Vorlage {{FPD}} (FP denied) markiert wurden, können 48 Stunden, nachdem die Vorlage gesetzt wurde, von der Liste entfernt werden.
- Es dürfen von einem Benutzer maximal 2 Nominierungen gleichzeitig platziert werden.
Regeln zur Wahl und Abwahl
[edit]Ein Kandidat wird in die Galerie der exzellenten Bilder aufgenommen, wenn folgende Bedingungen erfüllt sind:
- Passende Lizenz (selbstverständlich)
- Mindestens 7 positive Stimmen (Pro-Stimmen)
- Das Verhältnis von unterstützenden zu ablehnenden Stimmen ist mindestens 2/1 (eine Zwei-Drittel-Mehrheit)
- Zwei verschiedene Versionen desselben Bildes können nicht beide exzellent werden, sondern nur das mit der höheren Zahl an Stimmen.
Die Abwahl-Regeln sind dieselben wie zur Wahl der exzellenten Bilder bei gleichbleibenden Abstimmungs-Zeitraum. Die Regel des 5. Tages gilt für Abwahlkandidaten, die keine Stimme für die Aberkennung des Exzellenz-Status' bis zum Tag 5 erhalten haben, außer die des Antragstellers.
Ein erfahrener Nutzer kann die Anfrage beenden. Wie man eine Anfrage beendet, siehe unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Vor allem sei freundlich
[edit]Bitte bedenke, dass das Bild, das du beurteilst, das wohlüberlegte Werk von jemandem ist. Vermeide Phrasen wie „it looks terrible“ (eng. sieht schrecklich aus) oder „I hate it“ (eng. Ich hasse es). Wenn du dagegen Stellung nehmen musst, tu dies bitte mit Rücksichtnahme. Bedenke außerdem, dass deine Englischkenntnisse nicht die gleichen sein müssen wie die eines anderen. Wähle deine Worte sorgfältig.
Viel Spaß beim Bewerten …, und denke daran: Alle Regeln können gebrochen werden.
Siehe auch
[edit]- Zum Bearbeiten der Liste mit den Nominierungen klicke auf: Commons:Featured picture candidates/candidate list
- Eine chronologische Liste ist unter Commons:Featured pictures/chronological zu finden.
- Ein Archiv vergangener Nominierungen liegt unter Commons:Featured picture candidates/Log.
- Eine Anleitung, wie man Nominierungen beendet, findet sich unter Commons:Kandidaten für exzellente Bilder/Was tun, wenn der Abstimmungszeitraum zu Ende ist.
Inhaltsübersicht
[edit]Exzellenz-Kandidaten
[edit]Featured picture candidates
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 18:57:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Faial Caldera, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:57, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 18:46:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Charadrius
- Info created and uploaded by Needsmoreritalin - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent --El Golli Mohamed 13:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Minnivola pyxidata (Box Scallop)
[edit]Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 15:39:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
-
Right valve
-
Left valve
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Shells#Family : Pectinidae
- Info Minnivola pyxidata has an intersting shell. Whereas the right valve is convex and barely or not coloured, the left valve is concave with different shades of brown; created by Llez - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 15:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 15:50, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 07:35:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Germany#Bavaria
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 07:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Sebring12Hrs 10:47, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, nothing special for me. --A.Savin 12:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special for me. ★ 15:35, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 07:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info created by Plozessor - uploaded by Plozessor - nominated by Plozessor -- Plozessor (talk) 07:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 20 Jun 2024 at 00:48:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Japan
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by User:dllu -- dllu (talk) 00:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (talk) 00:48, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! Directly from another planet! ★ 01:17, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 21:46:39 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Trucks and buses
- Info It was particularly challenging to get the people in the bus clearly visible as well. created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 21:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 21:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Some perspective correction on the right… ★ 01:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Done Fixed perspective; I hope it's okay to do that in-place, as there are no (non-me) votes in yet. grendel|khan 21:00, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 21:14:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Other land vehicles
- Info created by dllu - uploaded by dllu - nominated by Dllu -- dllu (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- dllu (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:26, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very good lights and relaxing atmosphere. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:32, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Especially effective in full-screen mode, the scene conveys a pleasant atmosphere. Technical note: I discovered some white pixels in the upper part, probably caused by the long exposure time. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 19:54:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Musicians and singers performing
- Info Zara Larsson performing live at The Observatory OC in Santa Ana, Orange County, California. Created by Justin Higuchi - uploaded by Tm - nominated by ★ -- ★ 19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 19:54, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Looking at the metadata. Is it Astrid Smedplass or Zara Larsson?--Peulle (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: nice composition --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 17:21:50 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Madalena Islets flanking the city of Horta, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool! Wolverine XI 18:57, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 19:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question Hello, your work is really cool, but, can you check and retouch some evident stitching errors? (Added notes...) --Terragio67 (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much for catching these! Fixed 2 stitching errors. The area you marked on the right is actually not an error; it's this structure. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 16:32:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles and fortifications/Germany#Baden-Württemberg
- Info all by imehling -- imehling (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- imehling (talk) 16:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Not a great perspective. Wolverine XI 18:58, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:16, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tournasol7's style. ★ 22:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 19 Jun 2024 at 08:41:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of Europe
- Info created by Anna.Massini - uploaded by Anna.Massini - nominated by Anna.Massini -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:41, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor quality. Wolverine XI 19:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- CommentI applied because there are no maps of this topic on wikimedia and I think it is interesting. Does anyone else think like me? - p.s. quality photos were recognized — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anna.Massini (talk • contribs)
- You have created a beautiful map, but unfortunately a mobile phone is not the best way to digitize such a work for FP, since it creates very sharp contrasts and artifacts that are ruining you work and the resolution is also rather low. If you have something flat like this, it's often better to use a scanner with high resolution so that the details can be appreciated. Also the long text here should be on the file page, not the nomination. An explanation like that should be where people can find it easily and read it. This nom will be archived in a week or so and almost no one will see it. Did you write the text yourself, or did you use AI/ChatGPT or something? I'm asking because the length and the words of it are similar to what we have seen here before. --Cart (talk) 09:05, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately I don't have the map available for the scanner, furthermore the format would be too large to be scanned anyway, so I simply photographed and placed the verticals and horizontals straight, and it wasn't easy either.I added the text in the description. It is a text, but not composed with artificial intelligence, only translated with Google Translate. Thank you.(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 09:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nominationi withdraw (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 15:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:49:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Family : Glareolidae (Pratincoles and Coursers)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:49, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Amazing camouflage. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:13, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:23, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Not sure why it needs the camouflage. Wolverine XI 19:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Better than the other nomination --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:20, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:22, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 21:44:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Alaudidae
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:42, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:15, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 16:07:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Anseriformes#Genus_:_Aix
- Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 16:07, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Too tight crop and overall not better than existing FPs of this species. Poco a poco (talk) 09:44, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we should be providing a platform for images from someone that engages in copyleft trolling, would hate to see more small-time users extorted for €400+. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 15:00, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please refrain from using language that says that an identifiable person is committing an illegal act and please retract that statement so it's less inflammatory. We should keep cool heads in this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 19:58, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --WildMouse76 (talk) 18:36, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Charaxes eudamippus Doubleday, 1843 - Great Nawab 8.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 18 Jun 2024 at 11:03:11 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Nymphalidae (Brush-footed Butterflies)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great compo! Wolverine XI 19:03, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:46, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:27, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 19:19:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus_:_Larus
- Info created and uploaded by Diliff - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow 👌 Wolverine XI 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 22:32, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:27, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support focus and sharpness are incredible if you consider that the photo is from 2013. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:55, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't think we should be providing a platform for images from someone that engages in copyleft trolling, would hate to see more small-time users extorted for €400+. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ever heard of the phrase "separate the art from the artist"? Wolverine XI 19:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Adding onto that, the deletion request seems to be leaning towards {{Keep}}, which some users that regularly participate in FPC have opposed its deletion, so I wouldn't worry too much about that. Just my two cents. Also, I apologize if I wasn't supposed to use the Keep template. WildMouse76 (talk) 19:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Ever heard of the phrase "separate the art from the artist"? Wolverine XI 19:05, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- WildMouse76, you should listen to your better angels. ;-) The phrase 'Keep' has been turned into text instead of the blue dot, since it is a voting symbol and shouldn't be used in other cases. It may screw up the counting for FPC Bot. --Cart (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- WildMouse76, these are two separate things. In the deletion request, we're discussing ways to prevent Commons from passively enabling copyleft trolling, and the two proposed solutions (deletion and forced watermarking) have serious side-effects that need to be considered. Here, there's no side-effect to not promoting a couple of 10 year-old pictures of common bids. On the other hand, by promoting them we'll be actively helping companies such as Pixsy (and the photographers that engage their services) in extorting users by exploiting a loophole in Creative Commons licences. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please see my comment here. I don't have a problem with Commons FP voters opposing and linking to the DR but it is completely unacceptable on a WMF platform to make potentially libellous claims about illegal activity by named individuals ("extortion" is a crime, not a word to be casually flung about in writing). I know that on Twitter people can't help making a point without reminding the universe how horrible the horrible people are, but we're here to review which are our finest pictures. To the extent that licensing enforcement becomes an concern for that, we need to be restrained in our remarks. I hope that is clear, but if not please discuss on the DR. -- Colin (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I have done so:[1] Julesvernex2 (talk) 17:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Please see my comment here. I don't have a problem with Commons FP voters opposing and linking to the DR but it is completely unacceptable on a WMF platform to make potentially libellous claims about illegal activity by named individuals ("extortion" is a crime, not a word to be casually flung about in writing). I know that on Twitter people can't help making a point without reminding the universe how horrible the horrible people are, but we're here to review which are our finest pictures. To the extent that licensing enforcement becomes an concern for that, we need to be restrained in our remarks. I hope that is clear, but if not please discuss on the DR. -- Colin (talk) 16:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- WildMouse76, these are two separate things. In the deletion request, we're discussing ways to prevent Commons from passively enabling copyleft trolling, and the two proposed solutions (deletion and forced watermarking) have serious side-effects that need to be considered. Here, there's no side-effect to not promoting a couple of 10 year-old pictures of common bids. On the other hand, by promoting them we'll be actively helping companies such as Pixsy (and the photographers that engage their services) in extorting users by exploiting a loophole in Creative Commons licences. Julesvernex2 (talk) 08:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- WildMouse76, you should listen to your better angels. ;-) The phrase 'Keep' has been turned into text instead of the blue dot, since it is a voting symbol and shouldn't be used in other cases. It may screw up the counting for FPC Bot. --Cart (talk) 21:14, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:47, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 18:54:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Meliphagidae_(Honeyeaters)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 19:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 01:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:45, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:40, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:25, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support JJ, you've done it again. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:15, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 09:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:16, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:49, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular. Wolverine XI 05:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:28, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 15:06:22 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info Oxelaëre (départment du Nord, France), portal of the St Martin's church decorated with medallions carved with effigies of King David represented with his harp on the left, and Saint Cecilia with a zither on the right
all by me -- Pierre André (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Pierre André (talk) 15:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support beautiful symmetry.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed on the cornice. It seems there are stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done correction of overprocessing on the cornice. Note that the church is a building of medieval origin built on an inclined plane File:Oxelaere Eglise Saint Martin (3).jpg. Best regards --Pierre André (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I don't see any difference. The very first version had no problem with this. Here we can eaasely see the stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello, thank you for the comments. Did I miss something? The photo has not been the subject of any assembly. How could the sewing errors have been generated?. Best regards Pierre André (talk) 08:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Hello. I don't see any difference. The very first version had no problem with this. Here we can eaasely see the stiching errors. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 09:02, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Sebring12Hrs: Done correction of overprocessing on the cornice. Note that the church is a building of medieval origin built on an inclined plane File:Oxelaere Eglise Saint Martin (3).jpg. Best regards --Pierre André (talk) 14:48, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Harmonious and appealing composition. -- Radomianin (talk) 21:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:49:27 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#United States
- Info Northwest view upwards to the pediment, rotunda, and dome of the California State Capitol in Sacramento. I wanted to make the bright dome stand out well against a dark blue sky. The camera location was about 30 meters away from the building. Perspective distortion correction has been applied, more would look unnatural. What do you think, is the chosen gallery Architectural elements#Others appropriate or should Architecture/Exteriors#United States be chosen instead? I was a bit unsure, thanks in advance for your feedback. Created, uploaded and nominated by -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The view upwards to the pediment and the dome with the flags in front of it was particularly impressive to me. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfect symmetry, interrupted only by the banners proudly fluttering in the breeze, beautiful lateral light which emphasizes the three-dimensionality of the sculptures, great blue/white contrast which is, again, broken only by the banners. As the photo shows big parts of the building, I would favour Architecture/Exteriors#United States. – Aristeas (talk) 07:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for the feedback, Aristeas. I have updated the gallery accordingly. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:15, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:48, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:54, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:44, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support A great shot, well done. I'm just wondering, how many photos will you have tried? And..., if I may ask: with a slower exposure, would you have had flags motion and/or a brighter blue sky? I don't want to criticize your work, it's just curiosity. --Terragio67 (talk) 01:43, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you very much, Terragio67. My aim was to capture all the details of the white facade's structures in the bright light and contrast them well against a dark blue sky. A narrower aperture and longer exposure resulted in blown highlights and less detail on the white facade. In addition, I didn't have a tripod with me at the time. I took quite a few shots of this detail also at other ISO settings. But there are only three left because I deleted the most useless ones. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:05, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- TY very much for your prompt reply. Terragio67 (talk) 17:03, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 07:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 11:30, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Fun fact, I had a similar idea in File:California State Capitol (top), NW view up dllu 2018.jpg but much worse lighting and I accidentally cut off the left corner. dllu (talk) 22:58, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- The light has its charm: nice coloration by the evening light of the summer sun, too bad about the cut off left corner, dllu. I was just wondering why I hadn't seen this pretty shot in the category before, until I realized that you had just uploaded it yesterday :) -- Radomianin (talk) 05:08, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Radomianin! I only uploaded it after seeing your nomination. Actually, that reminded me to go through my Sacramento pictures and I just uploaded File:Blue hour front view of California State Capitol dllu 2018.jpg as well! dllu (talk) 05:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Good opportunity, very nice :) This shot is charming. Too bad there are people sitting in front of it, but that's hard to avoid on location. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Strong opposeStrong support What adreadfulsplendid photo of ahorriblemagnificent building! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:06, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:45, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:38, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 04:43:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Castles_and_fortifications/Germany#Mecklenburg-Vorpommern
- Info all by Tournasol7 -- Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain As author. Tournasol7 (talk) 04:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support the weather wasn't great, but I think the water reflection is a plus.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:28, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Water reflexion still works well. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 07:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:38, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:31, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support. Lovely photo. - Jmabel ! talk 00:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:34, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Famberhorst -- Radomianin (talk) 12:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:49, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:56:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Leucophaeus
- Info Thousands of gulls come to this beach just after high tide this time of year, just after all the horseshoe crabs have come ashore to lay their eggs. It's a feeding frenzy spectacle. At one point, something spooked them and they took to the air. We were standing out on a mud flat at the time and it sort of felt like they were circling us -- very loud and kind of surreal (and somehow we escaped without getting anything falling on us). This is my effort at capturing the chaotic moment, quickly snapping five frames for a panorama. The vast majority of these birds are laughing gulls (Leucophaeus atricilla), but there are several herring gulls, too, as well as Canada geese and mallards. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:56, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support An impressive scene. Reminds me of a famous movie quote: “Have you ever seen so many seagulls? What do you suppose it is?” -- Radomianin (talk) 05:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- It's horseshoe crabs! :) — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 07:37, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment there are some stitching errors on birds (imo nothing serious). I would be happy to support, if they are addressed. -- Ivar (talk) 19:01, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for taking the time to annotate -- I'll look at this and fix tonight. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:20, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- New version uploaded — Rhododendrites talk | 02:51, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Iifar for spotting the flaws that I also missed, and thanks to Rhododendrites for the fixes that have improved the image. Unfortunately there are blue edge repetitions below the wings in many places. They resemble chromatic aberration, but apparently are not. Maybe you can do something about that. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 05:25, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment two birds left with half of the wing, one of them is small (and far away). -- Ivar (talk) 07:47, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Iifar: Done Thanks. — Rhododendrites talk | 20:23, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Stitching photos is difficult and sometimes (as in this case) painful. So that everyone can appreciate your work, it would be nice to see the 5 individual photos. However, I'm curious to see the corrections you're making. --Terragio67 (talk) 02:19, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:41, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:24, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 01:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 16:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 17 Jun 2024 at 02:49:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Mimidae (Mockingbirds and Thrashers)
- Info I was watching this gray catbird (Dumetella carolinensis) when a red-tailed hawk flew overhead. all by — Rhododendrites talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 02:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:41, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 17:22, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ermell (talk) 19:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 19:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:35, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 13:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm impressed. Wolverine XI 19:07, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:51, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:39, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:10, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:29, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:40:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Order_:_Trachiniformes
- Info Sandperch (Parapercis pacifica), Anilao, Philippines. We have no FPs of this species. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 15:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wait, is it that a frog fish I see on the sea floor? Wolverine XI 18:38, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is so distracting. I can hardly see the subject. wait... Henrysz (talk) 03:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:37, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 15:44, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Harlock81 (talk) 11:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'm impressed by the camouflaged creature. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Two heads? ★ 01:52, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:30, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 15:57:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 15:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support A successful aerial shot for me.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support - Jmabel ! talk 00:31, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Very nice and moody aerial shot! --SHB2000 (talk) 02:18, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support A bit monotonous in colors, but quite good. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 04:01, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Well done! ★ 01:53, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Tikted to the left --Llez (talk) 15:09, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- I don't see any tilt here, but corrected perspective a bit. Красный wanna talk? 21:34, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 14:41:06 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Others
- Info Focus-stacked image of a bunch of historical CPUs created by Martijn Boer - uploaded by PantheraLeo1359531 - nominated by PantheraLeo1359531 -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- PantheraLeo1359531 😺 (talk) 14:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose What can I say...except that the crop is a little shaky. Wolverine XI 18:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 23:43, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support very cool Henrysz (talk) 03:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:53, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:08, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 10:05:49 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#Traditions
- Info created by San Fermin Pamplona Navarra - uploaded by Theklan - nominated by Theklan -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Theklan (talk) 10:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:39, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose (regretfully). Awkward crop and composition. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 06:44:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Charadriiformes#Genus : Calidris
- Info created by Grendelkhan - uploaded by Grendelkhan - nominated by Grendelkhan -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- grendel|khan 06:44, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support There are 4 pictures already featured for this species, which show greater details of the plumage. Anyhow, this photo shows an interesting pose of the bird. The eye could have been sharper. Very nice picture. Maybe, my support will result just a moral one, but nice done! --Harlock81 (talk) 11:30, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:07, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment For sure it's not a Calidris alba it's a Pluvialis squatarola El Golli Mohamed (talk) 20:18, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 16 Jun 2024 at 05:09:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family_:_Onagraceae
- Info Closed flower of a Oenothera stricta 'Sulphurea' (Night bloomer) Focus stack of 54 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 05:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:07, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Красный wanna talk? 15:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 17:27, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:40, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 18:19, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 18:06, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:40, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 15:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- George Chernilevsky talk 16:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 21:20:14 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Russia
- Info created and uploaded by Екатерина Борисова - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 21:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 02:19, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:54, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 09:52:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Tools
- Info A fisherman returns to the port at daybreak in Kerkennah The photo was taken from a fishing tool used to catch octopus; created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by نعيم قربوسي -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- نعيم قربوسي (talk) 09:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What an innovative composition. Charlesjsharp (talk) 11:37, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: would support if horizon is straightened; very impressive otherwise. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I fixed the horizon, thanks for the suggestion :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:50, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Great, I can now Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:33, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Skander zarrad: Please correct tilt as noticed above Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:52, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I suggest people vote on the basis that the tilt will be sorted. Charlesjsharp (talk) 16:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I'm going to, just I'm not at home for the next 4 days, but I'll take care of it as soon as I get back, I promise, thank you for your comment :) Skander zarrad (talk) 14:28, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning composition. --August Geyler (talk) 11:04, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Different and nice. ★ 12:57, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support !! for an untilted version -- Radomianin (talk) 17:12, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Creative composition but the blurry foreground ruins it, sorry. Because it makes the whole image too busy and cluttered. Imagine the picture without these distracting elements, it would be much better. Although the contrejour is average, with lack of detail, poor contrasts, and blown highlights -- Basile Morin (talk) 02:34, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 13:50, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Berthold Werner (talk) 13:51, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Wilfredor (talk) 17:57, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 19:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive story-telling composition, linking natural objects, playing with the themes of sea, sun and fishing, rationally, consistently, at the same time transcending on several axes, effectively making it three-dimensional. Pleasant light and good technical quality. --Argenberg (talk) 22:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- thank you very much :) Skander zarrad (talk) 15:16, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Lovely composition --XRay 💬 18:04, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Charles, Argenberg, XRay. – Aristeas (talk) 19:22, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Basile Morin, sorry. --Harlock81 (talk) 11:32, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing mud-puddling position of Prioneris thestylis (Doubleday, 1842) - Spotted Sawtooth 1.jpg
[edit]Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 04:04:57 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Pieridae (Whites and Sulphurs)
- Info created by Atanu Bose Photography - uploaded by Atanu Bose Photography - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 04:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 10:14, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:58, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Mounir TOUZRI (talk) 08:43, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:33, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The yellow portions of the wing seem a bit too bright for me. (example). --Harlock81 (talk) 11:36, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:56:01 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Portugal
- Info: Caldeira Grande, Furnas, Azores; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The Cosmonaut in Portugal! World traveler! ★ 12:59, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:17, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- There's some lack of interest in voting for certain photos (on the part of the community); why? I don't know… ★ 01:59, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Well, the interest is subjective and can't really be rationalised. So, I choose not to worry about it :-) --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:11, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 15 Jun 2024 at 03:53:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural_elements#Doors
- Info: portal of the Saint Michael Church, Savoca, Sicily; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 03:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose While I see this photo as a superior to full scale chapel (if you can't step further from the object — shoot the details), this picture is lacking wow and is blurred on the top. Maybe a QI but not a FP IMO, sorry. Красный wanna talk? 09:20, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 21:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Neutral I like this composition with the oculus a lot better than the cropped alternative below, but unfortunately the sharpness is lacking as Красный mentioned. dllu (talk) 07:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Alternative
[edit]- Info: square crop without the oculus. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:35, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:05, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- I withdraw my nomination --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:46, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 14 Jun 2024 at 10:29:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Macropodidae (Macropods)
- Info No FPs of the subspecies endemic to Tasmania. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 10:29, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support I see it hopping...Wolverine XI 21:50, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:08, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Not a huge fan of the open field, but everything else works. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:26, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, kangaroo's mouths are adapted to cut grass really short, which is why their habitat often looks like a mown lawn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- In Tasmania, at least. In the mainland, it's fairly normal to see kangaroos in dense bushland. --SHB2000 (talk) 02:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Unfortunately, kangaroo's mouths are adapted to cut grass really short, which is why their habitat often looks like a mown lawn. Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:45, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tanzania and Tasmania! ★ 13:02, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Where is Tanzania coming from? Wolverine XI 18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- The nomination above. ★ 20:35, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Where is Tanzania coming from? Wolverine XI 18:35, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:09, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 04:10, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 20:45:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Muraenidae (Moray Eels)
- Info Ribbon eel (Rhinomuraena quaesita), Anilao, Philippines. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 20:45, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 13:12, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:01, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:57, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -Theklan (talk) 10:09, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --WildMouse76 (talk) 21:11, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 11:40, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 16:34:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Laniidae (Shrikes)
- Info created by skander zarrad - uploaded by skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 16:34, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Comment This other image from Tunisia is not quite FP but I much prefer it to this nomination. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:14, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 09:10, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 12:16:00 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Styles and Techniques#Others (It is a combination of light painting and ICM)
- Info created and uploaded by Ibirapuera - nominated by ★ -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 12:16, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 13:26, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good fow factor. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:15, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- @Podzemnik: Wow factor? ★ 16:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:17, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 04:21, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 09:40, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:33, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Resolution could be better, really good composition. --XRay 💬 14:26, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 21:09, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 08:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Am I crazy? I don't think this is a photograph at all.. Look at how the lines differs in thickness when they're being stretched VS when being compressed... this is just a bunch of lines with a swirl filters on it and blending layers Henrysz (talk) 03:06, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 04:49, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I feel strange bc everyone is supporting this and I can't understand why. This picture seems like a very distorted image from my IR heat camera. I'm with Henrysz here. Красный wanna talk? 11:48, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 08:40:47 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals#Family : Cercopithecidae (Old World Monkeys)
- Info Barbary macaque father and mother with baby; created by Llez| - uploaded by Llez - nominated by Llez -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Llez (talk) 08:40, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose technically a good shot, but not outstanding to me. Especially the shadow in the background doesn't help. --MB-one (talk) 11:55, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose No focus on the eyes, and the shadows are quite annoying. Wolverine XI 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadow in the background, I'd also prefer lower point of view. --Podzemnik (talk) 02:14, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak supportThe shadows are a downside, but the baby steals the show.--Famberhorst (talk) 04:24, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 16:56, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 03:08, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:29, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 01:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Shadows, captive animals Poco a poco (talk) 06:06, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 13 Jun 2024 at 00:31:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1850-1859
- Info created by Nadar - restored, uploaded, and nominated by Adam Cuerden -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Adam Cuerden (talk) 00:31, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Question I get that the noise is authentic to the source photograph, but wouldn't it be even better to remove it digitally? --MB-one (talk) 11:59, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- I agree with Adam. He knows what he is doing. Charlesjsharp (talk) 19:18, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- That kind of cleanup tends to give a very unnatural look. (I did spend a great deal of time removing the dust, though) Adam Cuerden (talk) 12:04, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 19:50, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:52, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 06:53, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nadar was a top photographer of his time… ★ 02:01, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Red Arrows Radom 2009 t.JPG (delist)
[edit]Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 16:40:29
- Info all by Łukasz [Wolf] Golowanow (talk). There is a distressing amount of chromatic aberration in this photo. Commons:Featured_pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Air_transport#Military_jet_aircraft. (Original nomination)
- Delist -- Schierbecker (talk) 16:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist : very blurry --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per nom. --SHB2000 (talk) 06:42, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist Indeed poor quality even for its time. – Aristeas (talk) 07:51, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per Schierbecker and Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:44, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist per others. --August Geyler (talk) 16:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)
- Delist --WildMouse76 (talk) 19:07, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period ends on 12 Jun 2024 at 04:13:25 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Other objects in landscapes
- Info Ecocathedral in Mildam municipality of Heerenveen, Part of surplus building material stacked in a special way. (This is a special project that will continue until the year 3000).
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:13, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:51, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose interesting subject and technically a good shot. But the composition and contrast is not FP worthy to me. --MB-one (talk) 12:08, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Pretty boring to say the least. Wolverine XI 14:53, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support The quality is good--El Golli Mohamed 13:44, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy composition and odd angle, in my view. A bit of tree, a bit of wall, a bit of stairs, and a partially hidden building. No wow, sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 19:31, 11 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 19:32:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Lonely Arabian shepherd selling sheep in Ramadan month (street of Marrakesh, far from souk). My shot. --Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 19:32, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing out of the ordinary. Just a man with his sheep. Or am I missing something? Wolverine XI 10:04, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine, also some parts (like the sheep's neck) are blurry without an apparent reason. --Plozessor (talk) 15:55, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Wolverine 11. --SHB2000 (talk) 21:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support great composition. --MB-one (talk) 12:07, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support: the light is not ideal, but very expressive somehow. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 14:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per others. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:38, 6 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition! Henrysz (talk) 03:12, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
File:Balzender-Blauer-Pfau-Zoo-Duisburg-2024.jpg, not featured
[edit]Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:47:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:47, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, insufficient compositional quality for a common animal. Part of the organism is obscured and the background is busy. dllu (t,c) 22:09, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Distracting back- and foreground, and subject in shadow, sorry. BigDom (talk) 02:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Beautiful peafowl but a less than stellar composition. Wolverine XI 10:06, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:54, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per others -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:30, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 11 Jun 2024 at 18:38:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Herpestidae (Mongooses)
- Comment Banded mongoose (mungos mungo)
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 18:38, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:36, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Correct focus with acceptable DoF, nice composition and the subject is well lit, but I find the bright spot top left a little distracting. BigDom (talk) 02:14, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose I'd prefer the background to be all black. Wolverine XI 10:08, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:40, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support El Golli Mohamed 15:52, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 18:31, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:49, 3 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 07:49, 4 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:49, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:28, 5 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:28, 8 June 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 16:46, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
Zeitplan (Tag 5 nach der Nominierung)
[edit]Thu 06 Jun → Tue 11 Jun Fri 07 Jun → Wed 12 Jun Sat 08 Jun → Thu 13 Jun Sun 09 Jun → Fri 14 Jun Mon 10 Jun → Sat 15 Jun Tue 11 Jun → Sun 16 Jun
Zeitplan (Tag 10 nach der Nominierung)
[edit]Sat 01 Jun → Tue 11 Jun Sun 02 Jun → Wed 12 Jun Mon 03 Jun → Thu 13 Jun Tue 04 Jun → Fri 14 Jun Wed 05 Jun → Sat 15 Jun Thu 06 Jun → Sun 16 Jun Fri 07 Jun → Mon 17 Jun Sat 08 Jun → Tue 18 Jun Sun 09 Jun → Wed 19 Jun Mon 10 Jun → Thu 20 Jun Tue 11 Jun → Fri 21 Jun