User talk:Tournasol7/Archive25

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search


Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 17:49, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 19:23, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 16:35, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former hospital in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:00, 28 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place Saint-Francois 15 in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! District Court in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:11, 28 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis reformed church in Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Cite-Devant in Lausanne (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Charles-Vuillermet in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:17, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Cite-Derriere in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Chamboret 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 17:40, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Junien-les-Combes (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in La Croix-sur-Gartempe 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 18:02, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Gervasius and Protasius church in Mailhac-sur-Benaize 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 15:32, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Palais de Rumine in Lausanne (roof).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:57, 29 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lac de Bret 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former town hall of Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Uoaei1 05:25, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Avenue du Cloitre 35 in Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:51, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 05:50, 29 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Tersannes (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:33, 30 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:19, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Barbant (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. Alexander Novikov 18:10, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Taurion (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:58, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 15:55, 30 September 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martial church in Roussac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gaudentius church in St-Jouvent 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Water well in La Jonchere-Saint-Maurice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 07:56, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue Haldimand 14 in Lausanne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 14:36, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! View of Lausanne from Place du Chateau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:53, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:55, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:17, 1 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:39, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Rodhullandemu 13:02, 2 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:52, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Leodegar church in Peyrilhac (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 2 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lanhoso Castle 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Moroder 03:47, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Tour d'Echizadour (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Peter church in La Croisille-sur-Briance 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Nativity of the Virgin Mary and St Leobon church in Surdoux 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 15:30, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Morgins 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 20:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Morgins 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 14:45, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 rue Firmin Tarrade in Chateauneuf-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:57, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Saturnin church in St-Sornin-la-Marche 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in La Croix-sur-Gartempe 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 21:55, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Aigle.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:35, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Theodulos church in La-Tour-de-Peilz 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:52, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Haldentor in Aarau.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broye river in Payerne (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:38, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue du Grand-Chene 8 in Lausanne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! FR-CH boundary stone at Pas de Morgins.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:15, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Port of La Tour-de-Peilz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Auberge de la Bourgeoisie in Troistorrents.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 03:58, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in St-Martin-le-Mault (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Ximonic 15:05, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Baseltor in Solothurn (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand Council of the Canton of Vaud in Lausanne 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Francis reformed church in Lausanne 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:40, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la Cathedrale 5 in Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:43, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 20.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Maurice church in La Jonchere-St-Maurice 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:48, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:13, 5 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Valley of Vieze river 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Morgins 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riedholzplatz 24 in Solothurn.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:47, 7 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Prefecture of the district of Lausanne 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:45, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Former court in Payerne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:43, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Jourgnac (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 15:13, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of St-Gilles-les-Forets (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 18:45, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 16:59, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Landscape in Aigle (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:53, 6 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Roussac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Sauviat-sur-Vige 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:02, 6 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Maurice church in La Jonchere-St-Maurice 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 11.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 02:36, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:03, 7 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Salvaterra de Mino 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de la Oliva Salvaterra 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:20, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Puerta de la Oliva Salvaterra 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:17, 9 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:54, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:58, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Martin church in Sauviat-sur-Vige 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:14, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:57, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 17:53, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Broye river in Payerne (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:20, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Morgins 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:21, 8 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Halden in Aarau (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:04, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Domps (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Meard (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:12, 8 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 21:08, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 13.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support A bit soft but QI given the resolution --Poco a poco 11:09, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 17.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:21, 9 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courthouse in Zagan (3) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:16, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Courthouse in Zagan (4) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Zagan (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 04:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 34 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 19:25, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Salvatierra de Mino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:04, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old international bridge Valenca Tui.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:09, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castillo de Salvaterra de Mino 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:24, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 08:55, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:12, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Saint-Meard (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:07, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 13 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (33).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Zagan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:27, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 16:05, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (34).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support It's a weak promotion. Sharpness could be better. --XRay 05:20, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fire station in Chateauneuf-la-Foret.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 06:57, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 15:59, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 19.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:00, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Peter & Paul church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:45, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Zagan (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 04:56, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --CuriousGolden 07:58, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Anthony church in Chamboret 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of La Jonchere-St-Maurice (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:03, 12 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Achillea millefolium at Lac de Morgins (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
The flower on the left is sharp with good bokeh. The blurred flower + bee on the right is distracting, I suggest cropping it out. --Tagooty 14:44, 3 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 19:02, 11 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality, thanks. --Tagooty 02:53, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:21, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 9 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:19, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Heart of Jesus church in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 17 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:31, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Basile Morin 02:30, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Junien church in St-Junien-les-Combes 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 14.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:07, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:38, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower gate in Zary (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:25, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Exaltation of the Holy Cross church in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 04:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrobrego 4 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 04:35, 15 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in Domps 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 18.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 05:52, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:43, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrobrego 6 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:32, 14 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Spirit church in Zagan (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 6-7 in Zary (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 06:22, 14 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:45, 17 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Bohaterow Getta 1 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (27).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:11, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 32-33 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 04:13, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Jourgnac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Domps (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 15:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --ADARSHluck 15:26, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 14:43, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (28).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (Sharpness could be better.) --XRay 05:06, 15 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:26, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:24, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (A little bit soft. Contrast could be better.) --XRay 03:36, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (18).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (A little bit soft. Contrast could be better.). --XRay 03:37, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (22).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (24).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:33, 17 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Praejectus church in St-Priest-Ligoure 16.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:49, 16 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (30).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality, nice mood. --Aristeas 07:23, 16 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mary Magdalene church in Troistorrents 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:16, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (21).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 05:53, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:09, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Logis seigneurial in St-Martin-le-Mault 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:11, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Michael church in La Meyze 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --George Chernilevsky 05:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Giles church in St-Gilles-les-Forets (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Tilted a little bit CCW (to the left). --Halavar 15:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but the perspective is good IMO. Tournasol7 06:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support I findd no tilt. Could be a little bit sharper, but good enough for QI. --Steindy 12:05, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Bellac 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please add more sharpness. --Halavar 15:16, 12 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, Tournasol7 06:18, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 11:15, 18 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:43, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Armenak Margarian 06:56, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Heart of Jesus church in Zary (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 35-36 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Mary church in Chateauneuf-la-Foret (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:13, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ligoure River in St-Priest-Ligoure (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Burgnac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lavignac (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Peter church in Pageas 06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:12, 19 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:14, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St James church in Magnac-Bourg 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 07:46, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rynek 6-7 in Zary (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Medard church in St-Meard 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sts Pardulphus and Martin church in Sussac 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --DXR 06:15, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 09:53, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall in Zary (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 06:32, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Lower gate in Zary (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Trougnouf 08:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dominican church in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:33, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dominican church in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 08:28, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:42, 20 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! La Tour aux Paulmes castle (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:11, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Medieval enclosures of Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments * Support Good quality.--Horst J. Meuter 16:38, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 20:15, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 18 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 05:45, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 21 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle in Zagan (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 05:46, 21 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrobrego 5 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Chrobrego 11 in Zary.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 05:43, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Chateauneuf-la-Foret (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:33, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maison Sandherr in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:21, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 31 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint James church in Creussen (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 08:35, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hersbrucker Tor in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 05:19, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Roussac (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Question What is that spot on the right above the roof? --F. Riedelio 06:34, 18 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, it was a bird, I think. Tournasol7 05:25, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 09:16, 22 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:37, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 18:37, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hersbrucker Strasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will support.  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 18:38, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 03:05, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Bartholomew church in Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I will support.  Support Good quality. --Andrey Korzun 18:35, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Laghetto and Tempio di Esculapio in Villa Borghese 08.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 09:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Corso Vittorio Emanuele II 208 in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Via della Gatta in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Nice view and mood. Maybe a bit too bright to my taste. -- Alvesgaspar 14:07, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hotel Prati in Rome.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Sisto in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 09:39, 23 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Sisto in Rome (4) V.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Halavar 18:03, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Cestio in Rome (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:02, 24 October 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:43, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 53 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:42, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Goodquality --Llez 06:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Leonard church in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:13, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:41, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand

[edit]
Logo for Wiki Science Competition เรียน สมาชิกวิกิมีเดีย

เนื่องจากเราเห็นว่าท่านเคยเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่ายที่จัดขึ้นโดยวิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย เราจึงอยากเชิญชวนท่านเข้าร่วมการประกวดรูปถ่าย Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand ซึ่งจะจัดขึ้นระหว่างวันที่ 15 พฤศจิกายน – 15 ธันวาคม 2564 นี้

มีรูปแบบในการประกวด 7 หัวข้อ คือ บุคคลในวิทยาศาสตร์ รูปจากกล้องจุลทรรศน์ สื่อที่ไม่ใช่รูปถ่าย รูปชุด สัตว์ป่ากับธรรมชาติ ดาราศาสตร์ และหมวดหมู่ทั่วไป

หากท่านมีความสนใจในการเข้าร่วมการประกวด ท่านสามารถไปยังหน้าเว็บเพจ Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand เพื่ออ่านข้อมูลเพิ่มเติมและอัปโหลดไฟล์ของท่านภายในช่วงของการประกวดที่ได้กล่าวไว้

ขอแสดงความนับถือ
ทีมผู้จัด Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
วิกิมีเดียประเทศไทย

Dear Fellow Wikimedians,

Seeing that you have participated in one or more photo contests organized by Wikimedia Thailand, we would like to invite you to participate in Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand which will be held between 15 November – 15 December 2021.

There are 7 categories in which you can submit: People in Science, Microscopy images, Non-photographic media, Image sets, Wildlife & nature, Astronomy, and General category.

If you are interested in participating, you can visit the web page Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand/en for more information and to upload your files within the period of the contest.

Kind Regards,
The organizing team of Wiki Science Competition 2021 in Thailand
Wikimedia Thailand

Logo for Wikimedia Thailand

--Karto1 (talk) 11:06, 30 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:22, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 14:33, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Old town hall of Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 14:51, 1 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rhone River near La Balme 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 16:41, 1 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. May be touch too dark. --XRay 08:04, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poele des Laboureurs in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:56, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ossling (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (19).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:57, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 11:23, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stadtturm in Kirchberg an der Jagst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:35, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ossling (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:34, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Nicholas church in Pulsnitz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:47, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Mary church in Kamenz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:33, 4 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue des Artisans in Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Comment Can you give it just a little more space on the left? I don't like that the lamp is cut off (even though it is just a tiny bit). Otherwise it is good quality for me. --Domob 16:49, 29 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry, but it was taken that you see... --Tournasol7 18:08, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support That's fine, just wanted to check. It is good quality for me even with this crop. --Domob 14:08, 4 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (11).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 16:44, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 19:46, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:22, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ossling (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:20, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Martin church in Colmar (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:14, 5 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Our Lady of the Nativity church in La Machine 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 22:16, 5 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:06, 8 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --KaiBorgeest 23:19, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Vittorio Emanuele II in Rome (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Knopik-som 21:13, 6 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 26 in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Storchsnestturm in Oehringen (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:28, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hochturmkapelle am Zwinger in Rottweil (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:29, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 06:26, 6 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 9 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hersbrucker Strasse 1 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Some CA left at the rain pipe on the right side. --Ermell 08:12, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ New version uploaded, it's better? Tournasol7 10:38, 25 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Did not solve the problem. See antotation. --Ermell 21:56, 26 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]
And now it's better? --Tournasol7 18:09, 3 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 06:37, 8 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:10, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at QIC talk page

[edit]

A discussion is being held here, over the reviewing process at QIC and the possibility of improving our Image Guidelines. As a regular contributor to the project, your opinion would be most welcome and valued. Alvesgaspar (talk) 11:37, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Vorstadt 2 in Neuenstein (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:07, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 07:05, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 15:15, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:30, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (9).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality.--V.Boldychev 10:21, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (10).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:40, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 08:34, 10 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:19, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 00:13, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 7 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (13).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 3 in Wildenfels (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:31, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 32 in Pegnitz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:29, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hofgarten in Oehringen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:32, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 24 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Aristeas 10:03, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Kaysersberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:21, 11 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good and interesting. --Johannes Robalotoff 17:49, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Oejendorfer Park in Hamburg 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Autumn photo, good quality --Michielverbeek 06:20, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ossling (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:28, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 11 in Creussen 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 12 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 08:52, 12 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:56, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thyssenkrupp Testturm in Rottweil 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Church in Ossling (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Kirchberg an der Jagst (6).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kamenz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 03:49, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Wildenfels (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Rjcastillo 02:36, 14 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolder in Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dolder in Riquewihr (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:33, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine de la Sinne in Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 22:09, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Johannes Robalotoff 21:42, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Carsten Steger 21:35, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain of Constantinus in Kaysersberg (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:32, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 16:44, 13 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Poststrasse 18 in Kirchberg an der Jagst.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:23, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visitor centre in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 07:24, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visitor centre and Grand'Rue in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 Avenue de Gaulle in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Route de Bergheim in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johann-Sebastian-Bach-Platz 7 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:00, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Promenade 26 in Ansbach (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:34, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neustadt 35 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:32, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Lawrence chapel in Rottweil 05.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Sebring12Hrs 06:03, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 24 in Rottweil.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:33, 15 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 5 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:28, 15 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ponte Sant'Angelo in Rome (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 07:03, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place de la Premiere-Armee in Ribeauville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 06:59, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 place de la Premiere-Armee in Ribeauville (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:24, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Rue des Juifs in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! JS-Bach-Platz 22 in Ansbach (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 07:36, 16 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 6 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:22, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ev.-lutheran parish church in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 16 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:00, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Rue des Juifs in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 21:07, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 21 rue Klobb in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --V.Boldychev 07:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 17 rue Klobb in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 07:11, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Schlossstrasse 24 in Neuenstein.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:27, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Protestant church in Daun (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 17 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Rottweil (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Kirchberg an der Jagst (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:13, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 28 Grand’Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Holy Cross church in Kaysersberg (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality (and with a slight crop to the right it will become symmetric). --C messier 22:29, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a ghost left bottom corner and a light dust spot in the sky. --Steindy 17:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 15:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Only in part of the spots. The not at all small ghost can still be seen. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Synagogue of Colmar (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
There is a large dust spot in the sky, --Steindy 17:57, 7 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 15:08, 10 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
No, not done. --Steindy 14:58, 11 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Steindy 20:16, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:16, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 21 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:04, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 39 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 10:12, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 44 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ermell 08:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 10:18, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Michielverbeek 06:26, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de l'Hotel-de-Ville in Ribeauville (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 10 Rue des Freres Mertian in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:58, 18 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2 place de l'Ancien-Hopital in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:41, 18 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 06:55, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 90 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Rue de la Fraternite in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 23:07, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Neues Schloss in Bayreuth (14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Altes Schloss in Bayreuth (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:48, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Wahnfried house in Bayreuth (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hulged 05:29, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kanzleistrasse 7 in Bayreuth (4).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:46, 19 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 38 in Lauf an der Pegnitz (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 rue Klobb in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:20, 19 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:18, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (8).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:42, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Place de la Sinne in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 19:41, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 4 in Ansbach.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:23, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 23 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Ercé 07:13, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz in Ansbach 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:55, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Martin-Luther-Platz 12 in Ansbach 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Buettenstrasse 2 in Ansbach (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:56, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Kaysersberg (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Cut off that huge white space on the top edge --Jakubhal 16:43, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 06:08, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Thanks. Good quality. --Jakubhal 06:47, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Castle of Neuenstein (15).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Unfavorable image composition (disturbing flagpole) and cropping (IMO too much foreground). --F. Riedelio 17:10, 13 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done, Tournasol7 06:05, 20 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality now. --F. Riedelio 08:26, 20 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marktplatz 14 in Creussen (3).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:21, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 3 Place de la Republique in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Tagooty 03:11, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 134 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 134 Grand'Rue in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Rue du Vieux Lavoir in Ribeauville (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 11 Rue du Vieux Lavoir in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Frank Schulenburg 02:33, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 18 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchstrasse in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kirchstrasse 1 in Kamenz (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality -- Johann Jaritz 07:09, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwingerstrasse 4 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Commonists 09:12, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Zwingerstrasse 6 in Kamenz.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --Palauenc05 09:08, 21 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 1 Place du Bouc in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:56, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Riquewihr (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 21:31, 21 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St John the Baptist church in Ansbach (17).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments {{{3}}}

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Geschwister-Scholl-Haus in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 06:37, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grimmaische Strasse 2-4 in Leipzig.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:21, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Historical town hall of Muenster (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:19, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Ducal Museum in Gotha 09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 06:20, 22 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Town hall of Lauf an der Pegnitz (5).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --F. Riedelio 16:51, 22 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:11, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:07, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 9 in Gotha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:53, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Mainzer Gasse in Alsfeld (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Famberhorst 05:52, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Thomaskirchhof 20 in Leipzig (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptmarkt 39 in Gotha (1).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Klosterstrasse 3 in Blankenheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:22, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Gregory church in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Place de la Republique in Ribeauville 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fountain at Place de la Republique in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Johannesstrasse 6 in Blankenheim (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Velvet 07:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Place de la 1e Armee in Ribeauville.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 22:50, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Visitor centre in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 10:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:07, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 4 rue Salzmann in Ribeauville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Augustgeyler 09:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Porte des bouchers in Ribeauville 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Llez 07:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Salvator basilica in Pruem 07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:23, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! St Paul cathedral in Muenster 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. (Sharpness just acceptable.) --XRay 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Saint Thomas church in Leipzig (12).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --XRay 05:58, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Augustinian church in Gotha (7).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:25, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Hauptstrasse 84 in Bensheim.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality.--Agnes Monkelbaan 05:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Fontaine du cerf in Ribeauville (2).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --AStiasny 07:26, 24 November 2021 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 07:08, 27 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]