Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 09 2022

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:Blick_in_den_Inselosten_von_Baltrum_(Nationalpark_niedersächsisches_Wattenmeer).jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Dunes of Baltrum --Ssprmannheim 19:09, 2 May 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline
  •  Comment Lovely image! The horizon appears tilted CCW. Is this natural, or needs correction? --Tagooty 02:48, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment I uploaded a new version with corrected horizon --Ssprmannheim 12:47, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. Consider nominating for FP. --Tagooty 02:18, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose I disagree. Overprocessed, looks unnatural, failed sun. --Milseburg 13:05, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Very beautiful composition and colors, but this is very overprocessed. --Sebring12Hrs 15:01, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 1 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 13:02, 8 May 2022 (UTC)

File:003_2022_04_09_Ei.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination The Egg of Columbus in the sidelight
    --F. Riedelio 09:10, 20 April 2022 (UTC)
  • Decline  Oppose I like the idea, but I can't see that anything is sharp. --Peulle 07:55, 28 April 2022 (UTC)
    ✓ New version Thanks for the review. --F. Riedelio 09:08, 29 April 2022 (UTC)
  •  Comment Compared to the first version, in the new version the right side is overexposed without any detail. The central section is only marginally improved. Not yet a QI to me. --Tagooty 02:27, 1 May 2022 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Per others. --Palauenc05 06:08, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Total: 0 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Declined   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 12:56, 8 May 2022 (UTC)