Commons:特色图片评选
特色图片评选 欢迎来到特色图片评选!社群将在此投票决定图片是否会被选为维基共享资源最优秀的图片之一,即特色图片,每日图片的图像便是从特色图片中选取的。特色图片是中文维基百科最令人感到印象深刻,也是最具百科性的图片或图表。谚语有云:“一画胜千言。”特色图片能够让条目的内容更加清楚丰富。如果你认为你已经创作或找到了一张可能有价值的图像,请把它加到“提名”部分。如果在10天后达成了共识,图像就会成功入选。 这里列出了特色图片的评选记录,你也可以在下方查看按时间顺序列出的图片:2004年、2005年, 2006年、2007年、2008年、2009年、2010年、2011年、2012年、2013年、2014年、2015年、2016年、2017年、2018年、2019年、2020 以及本月。 关于我们最好的照片的另一个概述,请参阅我们的年度评选。 |
|
规范[edit]
提名[edit]如果您认为您已经找到或拍摄了一张可能符合标准的图像,并使用了适当的图像描述和版权标记许可,那么请按照如下步骤操作: 1. 按照括号内的格式(Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:提名图像名称.jpg)在下方的文本框输入图像名称,然后点击“创建新提名”按钮。
推荐操作:请COM:FP的列表处添加一个分类。 可选操作:如果您不是图像的创建者,请通知在他/她的讨论页添入“ 注意,你的荧光屏可能未调校妥当![edit]光暗度[edit]在讨论图像的光暗度的时候,投票者有必要知道他们的屏幕显示有否被适当地调整。不同的屏幕显示,它们显示阴影细节的能力亦大有不同。旁边为一幅画了四个暗灰色的圆圈的图片。如果您能辨明其中三个(甚至四个)圈子,那表示你的的屏幕可以正确地显示阴影细节。如果你只能够看到三个以下的圈子,你可能需要调整你的屏幕以及/或者电脑显示设置。一些显示设备可能无法被调整至观察阴影细节的最理想度数,故此请在投票的时候考虑这点。如果可行的话,也可以考虑把它打印出来。 色彩度[edit]在伽玛调整的屏幕显示上从几尺之外观看右图,图中四个不同颜色的圈子会自然混入背景之中。如果他们完全跟背景混合,你则须要调校你的伽玛设置(在电脑的输出设置上,而不在于屏幕显示),直到它们能彼此融合。调校的过程也许会非常困难,然而轻微的偏差并不是致命伤。未能更正的个人电脑显示通常会显示出比背景深色的圈子。请注意,在液晶显示(无论膝上电脑或者平面屏幕)上观看图片,你的观看角度有很大可能影响屏幕上的图像质素。如有需要,请点击图像以获得更多技术信息。 |
Featured picture candidates[edit]
File:Decollage d'un groupe de flamants roses.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:58:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds
- Info created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by Skander zarrad -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Skander zarrad (talk) 14:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Swan in lake.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 13:41:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: [[Commons:Featured pictures/<add the gallery here>]]
- Info created by 48JCL - uploaded by 48JCL - nominated by 48JCL -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- 48JCL (talk) 13:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Lactarius resimus Груздь настоящий.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 14:31:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Fungi#Family : Russulaceae
- Info created by Avustfel - uploaded by Avustfel - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 14:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Duisburg, Landschaftspark Duisburg-Nord, Hochofen 5, Halle -- 2024 -- 4164 (kreativ 4).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 07:15:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo_techniques/Styles_and_Techniques#Intentional camera movement (ICM)
- Info created and uploaded and nominated by XRay -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info It's probably (once again) a somewhat daring nomination, but I really like the picture. That was ultimately the deciding factor for the nomination. The motif is a simple gate in the Duisburg-Nord Landscape Park. The basis for this photo was taken using the ICM technique. This photo was enhanced in color and an additional layer was added with the mirrored photo. The two resulting layers were blended together. I lack the courage to nominate an even more intense version. ;-) --XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- XRay 💬 07:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose If it was an original photograph, it would have been interesting, but it seems to be 100% symmetrical at a pixel level through the vertical axis, which means it is more digitally composed (like two parts copy-pasted on a software) than natural. Something abstract, but too far from a real photograph or a real subject. Moreover, the appearance looks weird around the yellow lines, there are kind of artifacts, and this rupture is very visible, as if there were different layers. Overall the result is not very aesthetic, in my opinion. Sorry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:09, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Paysage de fin de journée à la Galite.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 06:40:18 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 06:40, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The horizon must be adjusted, a lot of noise in the sky. Please improve your image. And why did you set a category for the nomination page? I removed the category. Please improve the categorization of your image too. See COM:CAT. --XRay 💬 08:34, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi Atef Ouni, I see that you are starting to settle in here at FPC, but there are still a few things you need to learn. For a FPC, the documentation on the files page is just as important as the picture itself. I have fixed that for you on some of your nominations, please take a look at the changes I have done on your file pages. It would also be good if you learned a bit more about how categories work on Commons. They are not the same as "tags" that you use on other media platforms. You went a bit wild on this photo ;-) , and I have cleaned it up for you. You can learn more about how they work at Commons:Categories/fr. And like XRay said, the categories stay on the file page, they do not belong on nominations. Another important piece of information for FPs is the location. Please add it to this photo, and preferably add it to other photos too. It is very valuable to know when the images are used in Wikipedia articles. It is always a lot to take in when you come to a new forum like this, but we've all been there, and things will get easier. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:36, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing moisture sucking and peeing activity of Papilio krishna (Moore, 1858) - Krishna Peacock (2) WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 03:56:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Papilionidae (Swallowtails)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 03:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Toco Toucan (Ramphastos toco) - 48153967707.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 28 May 2024 at 00:24:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Ramphastidae (Toucans)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The issues addressed in the first nomination have been resolved, and the new version now shows on all pages. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:24, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:41, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:45, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:32, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Bond Lake winter.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:58:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Canada#Ontario
- Info: three men walking across frozen Bond Lake; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Sorry, but Nothing special in the photo,TOUMOU (talk) 08:30, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Purple martin in flight (30977).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:36:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family_:_Hirundinidae_(Swallows)
- Info Purple martin in flight, slowing down as it approaches its nest. Spent a long time try to get a sharp photo of these very fast birds -- I was happy with this one.
Note: I tried something with the sky that I haven't attempted before, pulling a cloud from another shot taken at the same place at the same time from roughly the same direction. I don't know if that's too much retouching for FPC, but erring on the side of disclosure (it didn't affect the bird itself -- just improved the background a little). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC) - Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good job TOUMOU (talk) 08:27, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:White ibis (10268).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 23:04:31 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Family : Threskiornithidae (Ibises and Spoonbills)
- Info White ibis. For some reason, a flock of white ibis has started nesting in this weird spot in New Jersey, hundreds of miles north of their usual range. I took many photos, but like this one for the way the sunlit leaves kind of vignette the bird -- kind of like a zoo shot (but it's wild). all by — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 23:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moineaux - Sud tunisien.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 21:34:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Passeriformes#Family : Passeridae (Old world sparrows)
- Info A sparrow in southern Tunisia singing created by Skander zarrad - uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 21:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment FYI that looks like a male Spanish sparrow (Passer hispaniolensis). — Rhododendrites talk | 22:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes it is , do you want to change the category TOUMOU (talk) 23:35, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- {{Done}} I added the location of the photo, it was taken as part of a photo walk organised during the WLE this year Thank you for your help and suggestion TOUMOU (talk) 11:55, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Hi TOUMOU, I see that Rhododendrites has helped you with the categories and fixing the description, thanks for that. Documentation of the photo is just as important for FPC as a good image, so take a look at the changes that have been made on the file page. Good information on the file page will always improve your chances of getting a photo promoted to FP, since info makes it more valuable to the Wiki project. Therefore, would you please add the location to the photo too. If you don't know it, please ask the photographer Skander zarrad. I have fixed the gallery link for you. You need to specify both the right page and the section. When you nominate an image here, you become sort of a "temporary caretaker" of that photo, and it's up to you to make sure everything is fixed and correct. Best, --Cart (talk) 10:57, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sweets-Jamin-Store-2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 19:30:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Sweet food
- Info all by Tuxyso -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Tuxyso (talk) 19:30, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This makes me hungry. --SHB2000 (talk) 23:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 23:06, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:06, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Might go to Apeldoorn just to eat the sweets. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:42, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 05:47, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, subject -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:15, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 11:29, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Dar El Hadith - 20240512 153022.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 17:13:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Architectural elements#Walls
- Info created by Riad Salih - uploaded by Riad Salih - nominated by Riad Salih -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Riad Salih (talk) 17:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Two black cabs with Big Ben in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 14:01:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Automobiles
- Info created by Pedro Lastra - uploaded by JustEMV - nominated by JustEMV -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- JustEMV (talk) 14:01, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice idea, but the car is on shadows, too harsh shadow, and motion blur Ezarateesteban 15:13, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Close wing Basking of Spindasis vulcanus (Fabricius, 1775) - Common Silverline WLB.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 11:53:21 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods/Lepidoptera#Family : Lycaenidae (Blues, coppers and hairstreaks)
- Info created by Anitava Roy - uploaded by Anitava Roy - nominated by Atudu -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atudu (talk) 11:53, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose too blurry for a FPC Ezarateesteban 15:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose at 100% scale there are visible artifacts of too strong digital processing. Sorry. --LexKurochkin (talk) 18:00, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At Paraty 2023 080 - High tide at Rua da Praia.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 27 May 2024 at 08:15:55 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Architecture/Exteriors#Brazil
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 08:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 10:28, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 00:56, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:At La Palma 2023 097 - Salinas de Fuencaliente.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 19:49:13 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Places/Industry#Spain
- Info created by Mike Peel - uploaded by Mike Peel - nominated by Mike Peel -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mike Peel (talk) 19:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:29, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:31, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 17:15:43 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info Tanner at work, Medina of Marrakesh. My shot. --Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 17:15, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Nice photo! Are you sure he is a tanner or has there been a simple mix-up in the translation? A tanner is someone who process the raw hides into leather, a very hazardous and revolting job. After that the leather goes to a currier who dyes and prepare the leather before it can be made into different things by a leather worker. Traditionally, such craftsmen are called "saddlers" even if they make other things from leather than saddles. Perhaps he performs all three professions and we only see one of them (leather working) here in the photo. Love the cat! :-) --Cart (talk) 17:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 17:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 01:31, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Shagil Kannur (talk) 08:07, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support good Ezarateesteban 15:16, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 15:23, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Amazing. Riad Salih (talk) 17:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 08:04, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Composition, angle of view, cat and chair -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:18, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Screws city line.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:38:34 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Photo techniques/Black and White#Objects
- Info created and uploaded by Wilfredor, nominated by Yann
- Support I like the comparison between technology and modern city skyline. Very good quality. -- Yann (talk) 11:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Per Yann.--Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:02, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Giles Laurent. Thanks to him. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:48, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:38, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 13:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support Spectacular composition! ★ 14:17, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Wilfredor, I believe this is missing a {{Retouched picture}} and a Digitally manipulated photographs category? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 19:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)Support An interesting installation.-- Radomianin (talk) 20:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)- Comment The result is beautiful on thumbnail but looking closer I'm disturbed by the fact that the reflexion of every object is not starting right at the bottom of each object individually as it should be the case for a real reflexion. We can also still see a visible line along the bottom of the screws (probably resulting from the copy pasted picture of the objects) that seems to have been forgotten to be deleted. Can that be improved ? -- Giles Laurent (talk) 23:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks to Giles Laurent for his helpful detective work. Any manipulation needs to be flagged on the file description page. I withdraw my support until this issue is clarified. -- Radomianin (talk) 04:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- There is also many weird artifacts across the whole image that should be fixed -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:17, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Undeclared photo manipulation (like this one and so many before) with visible technical flaws. Unwatch now -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I'm not impressed. Why are there so many nails? it reminds me of how in China they build a ton of identical high rises in a cluster. It's too realistic of a city Henrysz (talk) 06:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That reminds me strongly of two of my own pictures (both FP): File:Sechskantschrauben -- 2020 -- 3985-8.jpg and File:Schrauben, Muttern und Unterlegscheiben -- 2020 -- 4150.jpg --XRay 💬 07:20, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:TPF RBDe 560 Chocolat Express Viaduc de Grandfey.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 11:04:36 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land_vehicles#Rail_vehicles
- Info created by David Gubler - uploaded by David Gubler - nominated by Bruce1ee -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- —Bruce1eetalk 11:04, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Ermell (talk) 13:42, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:53, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support i like train dllu (t,c) 04:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 07:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Striking angle, impressive structure, taken at the right moment -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:19, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Pécheur sur son bateau à Kerkennah.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 07:43:10 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Water transport#Boats
- Info created by Atef Ouni - uploaded by Atef Ouni - nominated by Atef Ouni -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Atef Ouni (talk) 07:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice effect of infinity with the horizon line disappearing between the water and the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 07:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- iMahesh (talk) 10:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Per Basile. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 12:01, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Out of the ordinary. -- Radomianin (talk) 13:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:43, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Could you add geolocation please? Yann (talk) 17:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thanks. Yann (talk) 19:39, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Yann done :) Atef Ouni (talk) 18:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:52, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Moeraseik (Quercus palustris), 29-04-2024 (d.j.b.).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 04:11:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Fagaceae
- Info Emerging young shoots of a swamp oak (Quercus palustris). Focus stack of 12 photos.
All by -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Famberhorst (talk) 04:11, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:27, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:51, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support.--Pierre André (talk) 08:57, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 10:08, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 20:37, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:094 Wild female Alpine Ibex at Creux du Van Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 26 May 2024 at 00:54:37 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured_pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Maybe crop the top a bit? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support I don't like crop/orientation, IMHO it should be horizontal Chepry (talk) 07:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- New version with horizontal crop is better IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks for your review. I agree, the horizontal crop is better. New version uploaded with horizontal crop (press cmd+R on Mac or Ctrl+F5 on Windows with file open to see new version). -- Giles Laurent (talk) 11:03, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:12, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 11:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:45, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 14:41, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:50, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:15, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 06:04, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support —Bruce1eetalk 09:58, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High level of detail -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:21, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Mujeres trabajadoras de la tierra haciendo producción agroecológica - Berna Gaitán Otarán - 03.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 21:02:26 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Agriculture
- Info created by Niamfrifruli - uploaded by Niamfrifruli - nominated by Niamfrifruli -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Berna (talk) 21:02, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Some photos get promoted at FPC because of their aesthetic value, and sometimes the documentary value is more important. In the latter cases, context is important -- can you say more about this image? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:EduardoVII(AR-MCR-AWM-CM-0065).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 18:39:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Historical/People#1920-1929
- Info created by Alfredo Merello - uploaded by Mauricio V. Genta - restored/nominated by Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ezarateesteban 18:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Poor contrast and color, bad quality, even for a 1925 picture. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special and low quality -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative version[edit]
- Comment sharpenned and more contrast Ezarateesteban 18:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Very grainy, even for a 1925 picture. Restoration not complete. Nothing exceptional. Yann (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Overprocessed + invalid alternative per the FPC guidelines "Do not add an 'Alternative' image when you create a nomination. Selecting the best image is part of the nomination process." -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann/Basile - Chepry (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Yann. --SHB2000 (talk) 12:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Thank you for nominating this image. Unfortunately, it does not fall within the Guidelines and is unlikely to succeed for the following reason: This is not going to pass. Yann (talk) 08:24, 18 May 2024 (UTC) | Anyone other than the nominator who disagrees may override this template by changing {{FPX}} to {{FPX contested}} and adding a vote in support. Voting will then continue in the usual way. If not contested within 24 hours, this nomination may be closed. |
File:Bangkok - Rama VIII Bridge at sunrise Jan 2024.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 15:26:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Bridges#Thailand
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom (talk)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 15:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Nice photo. I can't quite pinpoint it, but something seems to be missing for me. --iMahesh (talk) 17:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good application of the rule of thirds. ★ 18:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Ezarateesteban 18:47, 16 May 2024 (UTC) good
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 06:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice atmosphere.--Famberhorst (talk) 15:36, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Special light -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:21, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Laitche (talk) 18:14, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 23:03, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Fringe-fingered Lizard.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 25 May 2024 at 07:08:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Reptiles#Family : Lacertidae (True Lizards)
- Info created by Bill.pix - uploaded by Bill.pix - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 07:08, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice compo. and camouflage. -Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 18:18, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 01:00, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 13:47, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 05:35, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) (32532118720).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 23:26:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It is very hard to find a good image for this species, especially when there are no featured pictures. The majority either didn't meet the guidelines or had very tight/bad crops. IMO, this is the best one I could find. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is that bait on the left? --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I assume that it is the fish bait, just covered by the water splashing in front. The other pictures that did have the fish bait had bad crops. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose It's clearly not the best of the series, for the composition, quality, and angle of view. For example this one is better in my view. There are more -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 01:40, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Magenta G5 aurora over Tuntorp, Lysekil Municipality 11.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 16:49:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Natural phenomena#Aurora
- Info created and uploaded by W.carter, nominated by Yann
- Info Looking straight up into the magenta Aurora Borealis over Tuntorp, Brastad, Lysekil Municipality, Sweden. The aurora was the result of a G5 geomagnetic storm.
- Support -- Yann (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Love this color. ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Wow! ★ 19:33, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 19:44, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It must be impressive to experience northern lights live. Fascinating picture! -- Radomianin (talk) 20:40, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment What has caused posterization? Can it be sorted? --Julesvernex2 (talk) 09:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not questioning the camera settings, those seem perfectly reasonable. Is posterization also present in the raw file? If so, the issue is indeed due to camera limitations and there is not much that can be done without misrepresenting the aurora. However, in my own pictures I can only recall a couple that showed posterization on the original image. In all other instances posterization was caused by something I did during editing (e.g., clipping channels) or exporting (e.g., choosing the wrong colour space, using too much JPEG compression). --Julesvernex2 (talk) 11:35, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I'm not offended and I always appreciate advice, but there is simply not much I can do about my camera. It's like owning an old Saab and someone with a Ferrari is trying to give you tips on how to drive your old rust heap. ;-) You just feel stupid for parking next to such fab piece of machinery. I know my place, and it's outside this race track now. :-) --Cart (talk) 13:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I offered my own experience as advice, which is a regular (and, in my opinion, useful) occurrence on these pages. I apologise if I have in some way offended you, take care. --Julesvernex2 (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- The camera helps, but it doesn't make it all. The greatest pictures were taken with equipment way behind current technology. What's IMO most important is being at the right time at the right place, and having a bit of artistic genius or a human touch. And here you got it all, Cart! Yann (talk) 13:07, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, that's one of the great failures of FPC. I guess that a number of Pulitzer prizes or National Geographic pictures may fail here. This doesn't reduce the greatness of the pictures. It only shows the limitations of our community. Yann (talk) 13:59, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thanks Yann, that philosophy works excellently out IRL, but it does not apply to FPC. Remember that this community has snubbed some of the greatest photos and photographers through pixel-peeping and hard-liner tech talk. --Cart (talk) 13:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's EOS 600D from Canon was one of the best in the entry-level class in terms of image quality, similar to my entry-level D3300 from Nikon. But I'm largely happy with it, and it's interesting to see the tried-and-true sensor used unchanged for the 2018 D3500. As Yann mentioned, it's always the photographer behind the camera that counts. The camera is just the tool, whether it's an old Saab or a Ferrari. I would also prefer a higher quality camera, but family commitments and a moderate income make investing in expensive camera systems almost unaffordable. If I may repeat my earlier statement at this point, many of Cart's images would, in my opinion, be worthy of inclusion in the FP Media Archive via the FPC nomination process. Thanks also to Julesvernex2 for the helpful hints and explanations. Just my two cents to this conversation. Best, -- Radomianin (talk) 20:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you for your appreciated efforts to assist talented newbies. By welcoming them with open arms, we show them the open-mindedness and tolerance propagated by the WMF, so that FPC does not appear to be an elitist club that they will leave in fright. -- Radomianin (talk) 05:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Don't get me wrong Radomianin, I love my old cameras. They are quite sufficient for my needs, but my needs don't include gathering FPs anymore. I've had my fair share of gold stars, and my little hoard is enough for me. I'm much happier just doing maintenance now and helping newbies here, so they don't stumble on some technicality. --Cart (talk) 05:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- My dear Julesvernex2, your prominent collection of cameras is so way, way, way much better than the two I have, so of course you don't have these problems. My aurora photos are actually among the least processed of all my photos. All edits on aurora photos from such an inferior camera will only make things worse, so I use a very light touch. But the camera is what it is, totally inadequate for professional night photos, but I like to photograph what I see anyway for my own amusement and for use on Wiki articles where the images look good enough at thumb and on the file page. I would never nominate any of my aurora photos here, but I've learned to play along if someone else does. Thank you for reminding me of my humble equipment and confirming that I made the right decision to not nominate my photos here any more, now that technology has moved forward and I haven't been able to follow. --Cart (talk) 12:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Auroras are not like most light sources we are used to. They are not constant, like when you photograph sunlight, lamps or the moon. Instead they move constantly and quickly (the link is a good real time video of a lively aurora), kind of like smoke in the wind. They pulsate and throb, one moment you can have a bright formation to your left and 1/4 sec later it can flicker out and a new pulse/ray/squiggle of light appear above or to the right, and this aurora was extremely lively. This random pattern makes it impossible to set the camera perfectly and there will be some posterization if you want to catch the best of these light shows. If you shoot an aurora, you have to take the good with the bad. Also, in this photo, not all variances in luminescence are are due to the aurora. Some of them are small thin clouds. The night started out cloudy, but they began to disappear so I could catch some of the aurora. The small clouds are easier to see in some other photos, like this taken on the same spot, but down towards the horizon. The whole series is in this category. --Cart (talk) 10:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:51, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support An image of almost other-worldly beauty. – Aristeas (talk) 12:56, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see them in my country. --iMahesh (talk) 17:05, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:59, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 15:37, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support [1] — Rhododendrites talk | 22:45, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Great White Shark (Carcharodon carcharias) attacking a fish lure ... (29723220133).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 15:00:15 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Fish#Family : Lamnidae (White Sharks)
- Info created by Bernard DUPONT - uploaded by Helmy oved - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 15:00, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop at the tail, sorry. --iMahesh (talk) 15:04, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Bad crop. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:51, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
I withdraw my nomination -- WildMouse76 (talk) 22:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The copper chaser.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 14:18:30 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People#People at work
- Info created by IssamBarhoumi - uploaded by IssamBarhoumi - nominated by IssamBarhoumi -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- IssamBarhoumi (talk) 14:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment @IssamBarhoumi: , what is the subject here? The person or his work?. --iMahesh (talk) 15:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support after the changes in description and file name. Now, its much clear. --iMahesh (talk) 16:50, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- dear iMahesh Both of them --IssamBarhoumi (talk) 15:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment dear iMahesh thank you -- IssamBarhoumi 19:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
Comments about profession depicted |
---|
|
- Comment Possible to bring the shadows up just a little? — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Leopard (Panthera pardus pardus) Kruger.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:22:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Felidae (Felids)
- Info A number of FPs of varying quality. All by Charlesjsharp -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --iMahesh (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:24, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:11, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support Composition is not so good and only the front part of subject is in focus. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 10:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Stunning light and angle of view -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:17, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:49, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:48, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:21, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Blesbok (Damaliscus pygargus phillipsi) head Malolotja.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:30:41 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Artiodactyla#Family : Bovidae (Bovids)
- Info No FPs of this species. All by Charlesjsharp-- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Charlesjsharp (talk) 13:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That white mark on his face reminds me something. --iMahesh (talk) 15:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- An anime character from Dragon Ball. --iMahesh (talk) 17:10, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- a votive candle? Charlesjsharp (talk) 17:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 19:34, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I wish I could see more of his left eye, but who cares? -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:25, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:013 Black-backed jackal in the Ngorongoro Crater Photo by Giles Laurent.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 13:08:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Mammals/Carnivora#Family : Canidae (Canids)
- Info created by Giles Laurent - uploaded by Giles Laurent - nominated by Giles Laurent -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 21:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 22:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:26, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Tight crop at the right and at the bottom. But overall well captured -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:48, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 05:23, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Musée Louvre-Lens Fragment du palais de Darius, SB 23177 (1).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 10:42:24 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Reliefs
- Info Louvre-Lens Museum Fragment of the Palace of Darius, SB 23177
all by me except the artwork!.--Pierre André (talk) 15:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Pierre André (talk) 10:42, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Es-tu certain que la balance des blancs est correcte ici ? L'image semble un peu jaune.
- Are you certain that the white balance is right here? It seems a bit yellow. Yann (talk) 10:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Done white balance correction +5 with Gimp software, best regards--Pierre André (talk) 22:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Indeed better. So Support --Yann (talk) 09:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Hydrangea petiolaris (klimhortensia), 05-03-2024. (actm.) 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 24 May 2024 at 04:17:29 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Plants#Family : Hydrangeaceae
- Info Budding leaf bud of a Hydrangea anomala 'Petiolaris' Climbing hydrangea. Focus stack of 15 photos.
All by -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC) - Support -- Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 04:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:30, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:58, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 00:57, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 05:07, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Chepry (talk) 07:33, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 22:14, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support — Rhododendrites talk | 22:41, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Campamento de ganado de la tribu Mundari, Terekeka, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-29, DD 36.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Mixed_&_Groups
- Info Group of Mundari kids with cow dong ashes (as antiseptic agains mosquitos) in a cattle camp in Terekeka, South Sudan. c/u/n by Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool. Yann (talk) 19:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:25, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:07, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 16:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:27, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:46, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Pierre André (talk) 16:49, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 21:47, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Tribu Laarim, Kimotong, Sudán del Sur, 2024-01-24, DD 130.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 16:59:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People/Portrait#Women
- Info Young Laarim woman with extensive scarification, Kimotong, South Sudan. c/u/m by Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Poco a poco (talk) 16:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive! Yann (talk) 19:45, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:24, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:13, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nice photo indeed. But ethically i can't agree to this photo. Exploiting innocence of indigenous people. Sorry --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:41, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Scarification may be a part of their culture and tradition. I just expressed my misgivings on exposing these kind of people in public. It's just my opinion. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 16:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Who? The photographer? The "scarifierperson"? ★ 16:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yea, of course. They are proud of it, they must. They are innocent. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 18:52, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- That's your take, I don't share it at all. I see an interesting tradition here, not a person who is innocent Poco a poco (talk) 19:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I checked the case using Google and Wikipedia. The place is some 180 km from Juba, the capital town, it is definitely not a city like London or Tokyo, but it is a town of 490 000+ population, it has airport, banks, schools and university, telecommunication company, TV and shops of electronics, churches of several confessions, etc. There is a school and a clinic in Kimotong. So, I do not think that they are so innocent to not understand the consequences of photography. And I agree that the photo has documentary value and encyclopedic value. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I did not pretend to know the place better than you, as I said clearly, I just used Google and Wkipedia. I tryed to understand. And, actually, you told us your vision of the place only in this particular post. LexKurochkin (talk) 08:54, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Excuse me, but do you believe to know better than me where I was? it was not in the city of Kimotong, but a remote village in the province. And that's precisely why we went there. It was not a photo tour behind a mall in Juba. There is no shops, no current, no telecom, no transport or something like that in the area. The closest water well could be 1 hour away by foot. Telling this wiöl surely make no difference and people will believe whatever they want, but whatsoever. Poco a poco (talk) 07:24, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- With "in public" you mean on Commons, I guess, because they are proud of it and show it in public in their country all the time. Poco a poco (talk) 17:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Have you ever heard about documentary photography? ★ 20:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- 180 km without any transport means (or public transport options) and with no asphalt roads (a 4x4 is required) is not what you may think of (definitely not a 1 and a half hours smooth drive). In fact, wit a 4x4 we couldn't drive often faster than 30 km/h Poco a poco (talk) 07:26, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- There are of course different degrees of innocense, but i seriously doubt that she is aware of how people with a scarification fetish will use this photo. --Cart (talk) 14:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I think, yes, considering my other comment. Actually, there are not too many places of that grade of innocence nowadays. May be somewhere deep in jungle, but not only 180 km from their capital. LexKurochkin (talk) 07:03, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Can you ask the same to those people?--Shagil Kannur (talk) 06:22, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Who is "innocent" or "guilty" on Earth? No idea. But she has a striking look and wonderful colorful jewelry -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Héron garde boeufs à Oued Mejerda.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 17:02:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds/Pelecaniformes#Genus : Bubulcus
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:21, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:26, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:06, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:31, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:45, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 23:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Rufous-throated Partridge 0A2A9937.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 12:20:59 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family_:_Phasianidae_(Grouse,_Partridges,_Peafowl,_Pheasants,_Quail,_Turkeys)
- Info created & uploaded by JJ Harrison – nominated by Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 12:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:56, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Lovely, but the legs are underfocused. Wolverine XI 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- in such light conditions (low light) you can only open the diaphragm to full aperture to have a decent image and obviously everything will not be in focus. You must always take the shooting conditions into account. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 17:09, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Cart's statement comes across as passive-aggressive. If I understand correctly, you are directly placing me in the category of "voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically". That's fine, do you; there's a legitimate reason why I don't post my pictures here, but that doesn't make me any less inadequate. I have no problem with the other responses here, except Cart's. Keep in mind that this is not the first time it has occurred; see here. Wolverine XI 07:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yeah, this. Support --SHB2000 (talk) 05:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Very true! Unfortunately, this is an old problem on FPC. Too many voters who have never tried photographing under difficult conditions, or have no proper understanding of what can be done technically, will think that all photos should have the same quality as a well-lit, stacked church façade or a studio photo. --Cart (talk) 20:01, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support In perfect light, the focus is sharp on the eye, which matters at this depth of field. More is not possible at f/4. An excellent capture in my view. -- Radomianin (talk) 20:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Light and composition -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Superb shot as usual from JJ. Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. BigDom (talk) 03:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Radomianin. – Aristeas (talk) 07:08, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:28, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support There is no rule to have the whole subject in focus, and in many cases it is just impossible technically. The Image Guidelines state: "Depth of field is chosen according to the specific needs of every picture", and there is the example photo of a cat with focus on eyes and shallow DOF. I consider this image in compliance with the Image Guidelines. Nice photo of interesting subject with "wow-effect" IMO. LexKurochkin (talk) 11:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I strongly agree with you. This issue should be addressed. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:49, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support At f4 with 1/100s while still beeing at ISO 6400 it must have been a very dark place. The photograph could not have been taken in a better way as smaller aperture (=more DoF) would have resulted in increased ISO. Also to me the most important thing to get in focus in animal photography is the eye and the bird eye is perfectly in focus. Focus stacking is usually impossible on birds as they tend to keep moving and I always find it quite impressive how JJ Harrisson manages shutter speeds of 1/100s with them -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, I agree. And I have the same thoughts about JJ Harrisson photoes. LexKurochkin (talk) 15:29, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 14:47, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cart is right. --Yann (talk) 10:24, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:42, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --GRDN711 (talk) 21:32, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support A support filled with a recurring envy of JJ's talent and equipment. — Rhododendrites talk | 22:40, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:The Duomo and Tower of Pisa at sunrise.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Religious buildings#Italy
- Info created and uploaded by MHoser - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support 2024 and we don't have any FPs of the Leaning Tower. Nice and different perspective, by the way. -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Looks amazing. --iMahesh (talk) 15:42, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:38, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
OpposeToo many dust spots in the sky -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:17, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Fixed -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 02:12, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Lovely, but I have to agree that at least the most prominent dust spots need to be fixed. – Aristeas (talk) 07:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin and Aristeas: the author seems to be inactive, so I took the liberty of fixing the dust spots. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 00:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much, The Cosmonaut! – Aristeas (talk) 07:44, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 08:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support wow, that's surprising that we have no FPs of the Leaning Tower of Pisa. --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- That was a good one, Cart :–). You made my day … – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you know how picky voters are about tilted photos. ;-) --Cart (talk) 19:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The author can't help it, but I can't get used to the scaffolding in a prominent place.--Milseburg (talk) 13:55, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Just a comment (no critic of your vote!). I completely understand the dislike for the scaffolding. Personally I have learned to resign myself with it especially in photographs of very prominent buildings. I have visited Florence, Siena, and Pisa (to mention just the most famous Cathedral towns of Tuscany) each several times, but AFAICR never seen any of the famous cathedrals without scaffolding – when the restoration work was finished at one part, the next part was scaffolded to carry on with the work. The same applies to all major French cathedrals I know. Therefore I am rather happy with photos like this one because it offers at least an almost clean foreground (almost no cars, people, stands/kiosks – all these nasty things which often ruin photos of such buildings). – Aristeas (talk) 07:36, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- I wouldn't say ruin. But the scaffolding is too disturbing for an FP. The conditions for an outstanding image of this building were not present at that time. The rising sun is nice to have, but for a FP of this ensemble of buildings, I would forgo it and prefer if important parts of the building are not covered by elements that wouldn't normally belong. BTW, the crop is a bit tight, isn't it? --Milseburg (talk) 16:44, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Are you sure it ruins the photo? ★ 15:56, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
Atlas nautique du Monde[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 11:20:35 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Non-photographic media/Maps#Maps of the world
- Info created by Lopo Homem - uploaded by Gzen92Bot - nominated by ★ -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ★ 11:20, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good quality, very high-resolution, interesting document. Yann (talk) 11:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Excellent reproduction of beautiful world map. I love the detailed invention of the Antarctic Mundus novus ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 07:15, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Indeed! A fascinating mash-up of an accurate representation of the Brazilian coastline (taken from contemporary Portuguese nautical charts) with the made-up Terra Australis from the Ancient Greeks. Julesvernex2 (talk) 21:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High quality and very interesting -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:21, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:44, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja.jpg, not featured[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 10:17:08 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Tunisia
- Info created by Skander zarrad L'entrée de la vallée des gorges de Thelja
uploaded by Skander zarrad - nominated by TOUMOU -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- TOUMOU (talk) 10:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose IMHO, it would look much better if the plant in the bottom is not cropped and too much noise in the sky. --iMahesh (talk) 15:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Detail is lacking throughout the image. Wolverine XI 16:44, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose i am not sure what Wolverine thinks is wrong with the detail, this picture seems quite sharp to me. However, I miss an outstanding composition. The plant is awkwardly placed half cut-off at the bottom of the frame and I can't see an outstanding compositional idea in the landscape in general. Cmao20 (talk) 02:11, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Sunset view of Everest.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 23 May 2024 at 00:32:38 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Nepal
- Info created and uploaded by Nir gurung - nominated by WildMouse76 -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really impressive. Consider cropping away a bit of the sky though; not so much that we lose the beautiful deep blue hue of the upper atmosphere, but enough to make the mountains clearly appear in the upper half of the image. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 05:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Beautiful colours Daftation (talk) 10:57, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 11:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Spectacular light. ★ 12:04, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Really beautiful. --Shagil Kannur (talk) 12:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I'd honestly leave it as it is, wouldn't crop the sky. Cmao20 (talk) 15:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --XRay 💬 16:28, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:39, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Perfectly executed. Wolverine XI 16:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:29, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Nice! --SHB2000 (talk) 05:03, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 07:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 07:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:26, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 15:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ~Moheen (keep talking) 17:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:34, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Johann Jaritz (talk) 07:13, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Nice scene, but isn't it too dark? --Milseburg (talk) 13:06, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, there are details, but as I know from the high mountains, shortly before sunset there is still significantly more light, even in the shade, especially on snowy areas. Milseburg (talk) 15:43, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg Not in my opinion. The scene was captured during sunset. Also, you can still see the details of the mountain, despite the darkness. -- WildMouse76 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Milseburg I wouldn't say the scene is too dark. Again, noticable details. However, assuming by the colors on the very top, it is somewhere between nautical and astronomical twilight due to the redness. I've browsed through some categories of mountains during sunset, and the ones that had significant light had a more yellow shade, while this one is more red. The sky could probably be cropped a bit, but the sky is an important feature of this image. WildMouse76 (talk) 22:29, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Outstanding scene. But the sharpness doesn't convince me and the elaboration seems too dark to me. IMHO there is also to much empty sky. Overall not perfect enough for a FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:58, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Does anyone have an explanation for this phenomenon? (in particular for the red color of the summit on the left, with its sharp edge to darker areas) To me, this looks weird, but I'm obviously not from Nepal, so I don't know what might have caused this. I'd love to learn more. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 01:27, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- See Alpenglow -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:05, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Frank Schulenburg forgot to ping. WildMouse76 (talk) 03:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Frank Schulenburg, technically, it's the same effect that you have at the Horsetail Fall (Yosemite) (nearer where you live). With the sun at the right angle and normal conditions at sunset, the red light will prevail and strike the surfaces that can be reached by the light. The red light is not that uncommon, but it gets so striking when isolated to a few patches by the shadows of surrounding mountains. --Cart (talk) 11:33, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Question Is there consensus, that Everest and Nuptse have still late direct sunlight? --Milseburg (talk) 09:58, 19 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Flamant rose Thyna009.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 21:18:45 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Birds#Family : Phoenicopteridae (Flamingos)
- Info created by El Golli Mohamed - uploaded by El Golli Mohamed - nominated by El Golli Mohamed -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Image noise and weird blurring --WildMouse76 (talk) 22:31, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- ISO 250 : image noise? El Golli Mohamed (talk) 23:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment The blurred flamingo at left is a bit disturbing, but noise is fine. Please consider cropping. Yann (talk) 11:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cropped it, thanks El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I agree a tighter crop would improve this image Cmao20 (talk) 15:02, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- I cannot crop it further to the left side of the photo otherwise the composition of the photo will be affected and unbalanced El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:52, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The left crop is something else. Wolverine XI 16:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Good commitment, bird watching is a very hard task. New version looks perfect. iMahesh (talk) 01:40, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- I was lying on the mud in camouflage among the flamingos for about an hour and a half so they could gain confidence and come closer. Once among the flamingos I didn't have much choice; I always had flamingos outside the depth of field and surrounding me. That's why I couldn't do better. El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:43, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- He cropped the image to exclude the out-of-focus flamingo (old version), but now it feels imbalanced. Had he shifted slightly to the right when capturing the photo, the composition would've been a solid 10 --iMahesh (talk) 15:25, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Due to the crop. --iMahesh (talk) 15:27, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Here is the new version with the only possible crop with a good composition El Golli Mohamed (talk) 16:48, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak Support. This is the best composition, but the image is now quite small. Yann (talk) 10:23, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
Alternative[edit]
- Info Cropped by me. ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 20:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --El Golli Mohamed (talk) 21:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Support. --iMahesh (talk) 01:41, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support That's an improvement -- WildMouse76 (talk) 03:15, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Thank you El Golli Mohamed (talk) 08:01, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 13:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Henrysz (talk) 06:56, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Punta de las Gaviotas.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:17:19 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Spain#Canary Islands
- Info: golden hour at Punta de las Gaviotas; all by -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:17, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 14:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Famberhorst (talk) 04:39, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:32, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I don't like the textures here Henrysz (talk) 06:59, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:43, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Grüne Heupferd (Tettigonia viridissima) bei der Häutung.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 16:21:12 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Animals/Arthropods#Family_:_Tettigoniidae_(Katydids_or_Bush_Crickets)
- Info created by Stephan Sprinz - uploaded by Stephan Sprinz - nominated by Stephan Sprinz -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Stephan Sprinz (talk) 16:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:03, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Impressive. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 21:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support High educational value. --Frank Schulenburg (talk) 23:38, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 00:34, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Frank. -- Radomianin (talk) 06:08, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment In my opinion you've gone too far with the colors. The greens appear like radioactive on my screen, and when I check the settings on Lightroom, I see you modified the "tint" (+18%), added whites +54%, and shadows +100%. The insect is sharp but the colors unnatural -- Basile Morin (talk) 13:17, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 13:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:37, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose I agree with Basile Morin; the green color is way too much. Wolverine XI 16:50, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Ermell (talk) 20:23, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment I uploaded a new version of the image with (hopefully) more natural colours. But you have to keep in mind that the picture was taken in bright morning sun light (with the subject in the shadow), which leads to bright colours. --Stephan Sprinz (talk) 06:16, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:22, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:18, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --LexKurochkin (talk) 15:36, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Great composition, sharpness etc. The green still looks very strong at the bottom, but after all this animal has got a very bright green colour – Linné has called it Tettigonia viridissima for a reason (viridissimus/a/um means “greenest”) ;–). – Aristeas (talk) 09:30, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:31, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Panoramic view of Taj Palace Hotel and Taj Tower with the iconic Gateway of India in the background.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 15:18:32 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#India
- Info All by iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Abstain Since I'm the creator of the file, please inform me if any adjustments to the color palette are needed. I can make changes from the raw file if necessary. -- iMahesh (talk) 15:18, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 17:30, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Maybe if you crop the empty sky and water a bit, let's say to 16:10 or 16:9, it'll be better? Красный wanna talk? 22:13, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, it looks much better. I have cropped the dead spaces, please check. --iMahesh (talk) 12:06, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support now, thank you. Красный wanna talk? 21:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I think you were not very lucky with the light but I enjoy the careful composition of this photo and the image quality is strong. Cmao20 (talk) 13:48, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment: I think this would benefit from increased vibrance, especially for the reds that are particularly washed out. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 17:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @The Cosmonaut Done, I tried replicating actual colors from images over internet.--iMahesh (talk) 03:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support: better. --The Cosmonaut (talk) 05:09, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good now. Thank you for the improvement. – Aristeas (talk) 09:28, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 10:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Casio W-96H.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 13:47:17 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects#Horology
- Info Casio W-96H, second and beter try, light, colors etc. --Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Mile (talk) 13:47, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support The background is not distracting this time. ;o) Yann (talk) 16:19, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support This setup for the watch works much better and supports the intended effect. -- Radomianin (talk) 19:02, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Busy background (so distracting), with blurred and sharp areas, and dark and clear areas. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:53, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose per Sebring. --SHB2000 (talk) 22:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Nothing special. Daftation (talk) 10:58, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Honestly I preferred your last one, I found the colours and the background more interesting, but this is again good product photography and deserves a star. I understand that people might find it a little low on wow but that's a matter of the genre, still, I think it would be cool if we could feature good product photos like this. Cmao20 (talk) 13:33, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose The subject is very easy to capture, so nothing worth featuring here. Wolverine XI 16:51, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Info I would like to see, those who oppose to make similar. Wolverine "easy". I think you never made something like this, so oppose is irrelvant, who made them would never say easy. Stacked Macro shots are heavy work. Some 5-6 h of work,cleaning, editing stack mistakes, which are normal. Show me "easy" shot. please. --Mile (talk) 18:59, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- It's not my responsibility to prove myself to anyone, so think what you must. And please, don't take things personally. Wolverine XI 07:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support I could only duplicate Cmao20’s words. And no, high-quality product photos like this one are absolutely not easy: this is very much work. – Aristeas (talk) 07:01, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 11:20, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao20 and Aristeas. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 12:29, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Per Wolverine XI. -- Karelj (talk) 16:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- WildMouse76 (talk) 04:13, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 17:42, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Kluang - waterfalls on Gunung Lambak May 2024 01.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 22 May 2024 at 10:21:53 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Malaysia
- Info created, uploaded and nominated by BigDom -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- BigDom (talk) 10:21, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cool shot! Красный wanna talk? 22:10, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 12:07, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support IMO a bit oversaturated but I really like the composition Cmao20 (talk) 13:30, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Cmao20 Thanks for the support and feedback - only +2 saturation in PS but happy to dial it back if others feel the same. BigDom (talk) 13:53, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:35, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Comment Agree with Cmao20 it's oversaturated. Green leaves, blue water -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:09, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- @Basile Morin, The Cosmonaut, Cmao20, ArionStar, and Красный: Thanks for the feedback. I've tweaked the saturation of the blue, green and aqua channels, looks a bit more natural now IMO. Let me know if it needs any more work, always happy to get constructive criticism. BigDom (talk) 02:55, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Water is improved in my opinion. Thanks for the notification -- Basile Morin (talk) 11:37, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 14:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 09:10, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Scimitar Light Tank MOD 45149231.jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 23:14:40 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Vehicles/Land vehicles#Military vehicles
- Info created by British MOD - uploaded by Fæ - nominated by Schierbecker -- Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Super sharp image and the photographer captured the action quite well. Schierbecker (talk) 23:14, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Both antennas are cut off. Yann (talk) 09:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Very good quality, but cropped on the top. --iMahesh (talk) 11:00, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support TOUMOU (talk) 08:12, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support. The chopped-off antenna aren't a problem for me, the subject of the picture is the body of the tank. —Bruce1eetalk 07:18, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Crop isn't good enough for FP. --Milseburg (talk) 16:46, 17 May 2024 (UTC)
File:Питкярантский район, Валкеалампи сверху (2).jpg[edit]
Voting period ends on 20 May 2024 at 13:04:07 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Northwestern Federal District
- Info created by Красный - uploaded by Красный - nominated by Красный -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Красный wanna talk? 13:04, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 00:55, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support It could be sharper, but, stunning composition. Cmao20 (talk) 03:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support per Cmao. --SHB2000 (talk) 07:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --The Cosmonaut (talk) 16:22, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Oppose Good composition, but the sides and the edges aren't sharp enough to me, sorry. --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 19:56, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --MZaplotnik(talk) 04:46, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Giles Laurent (talk) 13:10, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak support -- I'm not absolutely happy with the colors, but the view is really breathtaking. -- Екатерина Борисова (talk) 18:39, 15 May 2024 (UTC)
File:2024-05-09 10-44-09 FortDeRoppe.jpg, featured[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 19 May 2024 at 07:27:42 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Interiors#France
- Info created by ComputerHotline - uploaded by ComputerHotline - nominated by ComputerHotline -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- ComputerHotline (talk) 07:27, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support ★ 11:42, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --SHB2000 (talk) 12:47, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Sebring12Hrs (talk) 16:18, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support --Thi (talk) 18:58, 10 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Poco a poco (talk) 11:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Weak oppose Please fix the chromatic aberrations visible around the stones and the wall at the bottom right -- Basile Morin (talk) 12:32, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- I don't know how to make it. --ComputerHotline (talk) 14:59, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Sur Lightroom, "Pinceau" (sélection) -> "Supprimer la frange" -- Basile Morin (talk) 01:06, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Je n'ai pas lightroom. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:13, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Pas de problème. Voir lien ci-dessus -- Basile Morin (talk) 05:35, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- For the record, the CAs have been fixed in the version offered above (link archived here). It's a choice of the photographer / nominator to ignore this improvement and keep the version with technical flaws -- Basile Morin (talk) 03:34, 18 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Good enough for me. Wolverine XI 21:06, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 04:12, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:25, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Ivar (talk) 18:27, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support Cmao20 (talk) 03:36, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:11, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
- Support – Aristeas (talk) 14:14, 14 May 2024 (UTC)