User talk:ThibautRe

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search
Welcome to Wikimedia Commons, ThibautRe!

-- Wikimedia Commons Welcome (talk) 03:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Swedish police car with lights on.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 18:36, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marievik 15 destruction (2023-08-29).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:06, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! MS Baltica 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:07, 31 August 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liljeholmskajen towers.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good enough quality to me, and a good composition. -- Ikan Kekek 05:04, 30 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 2 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Långholmen Kronohäktet 2023.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Need perspective correction. --Mike1979 Russia 15:01, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Let me know what you think after the update --ThibautRe 20:22, 31 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Much better. But the left corner is still not vertical. --Mike1979 Russia 12:30, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done Updated, also fixed some CA that was visible. --ThibautRe 21:45, 1 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Mike1979 Russia 16:03, 2 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 5 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Strato Södermalm (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:16, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:29, 8 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajen 4 (2023) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Not sharp enough and a bit deformed --Michielverbeek 03:53, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done I've uploaded a sharper image now. Regarding "a bit deformed", I believe that this is due to the building itself not being 100% vertical - the balconies are longer at the top than at the bottom so it creates this "inverted pyramid" effect) --ThibautRe 19:17, 6 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
For me a QI now --Michielverbeek 04:27, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajplats 6 (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:21, 6 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Blå Porten (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Skansen Främmestadskvarnen (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Roof of Nordiska Museum from Skansen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 03:52, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:22, 10 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marievik 15 destruction from Årstabron (2023-09-06).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --N. Johannes 05:58, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kajen 5 (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hemmers 09:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! K7 building (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hemmers 09:46, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! House under Johanneshovsbron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:21, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! STHLM01 seen from Skansbron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Jakubhal 04:22, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marievik 27 (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Grunpfnul 08:01, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:32, 17 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan secondary entrance door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:38, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Marievik 15 demolished (2023-09-14).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:40, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:20, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan main entrance door.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Virtual-Pano 16:43, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Högalidskyrkan from Årstabron 2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Nino Verde 13:34, 18 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 21 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brohuset from Årstabron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support Good quality. --C messier 18:45, 20 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 23 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Kungsholmsgatan 30 (2023).jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:32, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sculpture above Kungsholms kyrka entrance.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 21:34, 21 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm town hall.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 14:53, 22 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 25 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Main door of Stockholm Court House.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --MB-one 09:34, 25 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:34, 28 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liljan 32 (2023) 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Dome of Gustaf Vasakyrkan.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 21:12, 27 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:24, 30 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Östra Årstabron from the south.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Rangan Datta Wiki 03:03, 29 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Back door of Gustaf Vasa Kyrka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Hillopo2018 09:51, 28 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Riddarholmskyrkan from Monteliusvägen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 21:31, 29 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good quality. --Terragio67 01:03, 30 September 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:30, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Manhattan bridge and One Manhattan Square.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Liljeholmsbron open seen from Hornstull side.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 18:18, 4 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:26, 7 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Demolition of Marievik 15 from Tanto.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Mike Peel 17:38, 9 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Silouette of the Welcome sign near the Brooklyn Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:25, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Stockholm City Hall and Norra Tornen.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI imo.--ArildV 07:05, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Maria Magdalena Kyrka.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
This image needs perspective control and color noise and chromatic aberration need to be removed --FlocciNivis 18:36, 5 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done --ThibautRe 13:01, 9 October 2023 (UTC) Support Good quality. --Moroder 13:35, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:35, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Brooklyn Bridge from 60 water.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --FlocciNivis 17:21, 16 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:33, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Natural reserve near Denizköy, Karasu, Sakarya.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --C messier 19:32, 17 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 20 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Shadow of the Brooklyn Bridge cast on the Manhattan Bridge.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
Please check again tilt/perspective. --C messier 20:16, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
✓ Done updated persp (+ slight exposure increase) --ThibautRe 13:40, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
 Support Good now. --Sebring12Hrs 21:20, 19 October 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:31, 22 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Centre-ville de La Bresse 01.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments
 Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 19:38, 14 November 2023 (UTC)
[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Cornimont depuis la croix de mission.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Milseburg 14:33, 15 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:28, 18 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sabancı Central Mosque from Türkmen Hotel.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Imehling 07:58, 17 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 20 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Sheraton Hotel Adana and Seyhan River.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Quality good enough for QI, but it might have been a bit sharper --Michielverbeek 07:12, 21 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

--QICbot (talk) 05:27, 24 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Äntligen maj: Wiki Loves Earth 2024![edit]

Förra årets vinnarbild i Wiki Loves Earth!

Hej,
(For information in English, see Wiki Loves Earth 2024 in Sweden or other participating countries.)

Du får det här meddelandet eftersom du tidigare har bidragit med bilder till de svenska deltävlingarna av Wiki Loves Earth eller Wiki Loves Monuments. Jag hoppas att du vill vara med i år också! Som vanligt ingår naturreservat och nationalparker, biosfärområden och naturminnen i tävlingen! Utöver bästa foto belönar vi även fotograferande av tidigare ofotograferade objekt samt bästa bildserie om minst tio fotografier av samma objekt. Tävlingen börjar 1 maj, och pågår under hela maj månad. Om du har varit ute i världen och rest kan du även se om resorna sammanfaller med övriga internationella deltävlingar, och i så fall vara med och tävla även där. Expeditioner, fotosafari eller en helt vanlig promenad? Via en smidig karta som visar ditt närområde hittar du bra ställen att besöka – eller varför inte damma av fotoalbumen och tävla med bilder du har tagit tidigare?

Välkommen till tävlingen, och lycka till! / Alicia Fagerving (WMSE) (talk) 10:58, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]