User:Aristeas/Galleries/WLF FPC
WLF 2023[edit]
Bangladesh[edit]
-
WLF 2023
Should we try this ... -
WLF 2023
… or that one -
WLF 2023
… or that one -
WLF 2023
… or that one -
WLF 2023
… or that one? (Ar)
China[edit]
-
I also really like this top view (Kr)
@Kritzolina and Radomianin: Ich habe es mal nominiert – mal sehen … (Ar)
Successful :–) -
WLF 2023
(China)
Technically not perfect, but IMHO still a stunning image. What do you think? (Ar)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
(China)
Egypt[edit]
-
WLF 2023
(Egypt)
For me this is such an authentic family portrait. (Ar)
Not sure if this is one family, or a mix of two or more families, but yes, this is a close knit group of people and I like the picture a lot. I think we should remove the family category though, as we don't have sufficient information. (Kr) -
WLF 2023
(Egypt)
Very authentic and likeable portrait. What do you think? (Ar)
My only concern here is the bottom crop - do any of you think we should change this before nominating? If not, I would go ahead soon, as I also like this image a lot. (Kr)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
(Egypt)
Very authentic craftsmen-at-work photo. (Ar) -
WLF 2023
(Egypt)
Very authentic craftsman-at-work photo. (Ar) -
WLF 2023
(Egypt)
This could be a safe candidate, the focus lies on the hands. There are a few color fringes but they are really minor. (Ra)
India[edit]
-
WLF 2023
A possible point of criticism would be the curtain on the right. In my opinion, however, it's more of a plus than a minus. It opens the viewer's eyes to the perfectly placed main motif, giving it more depth. (Ra)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
Should be a safe candidate, maybe a little too soft? Post-processing would be worthwhile. What do you think? (Ra) -
WLF 2023
-
WLF 2023
-
WLF 2023
In between Holi is well-known, but we still need better photos of it. What about this one? (Ar) -
WLF 2023
Great photo for me. I fear people may call it oversaturated. But how could a Holi photo not be oversaturated? ;–) (Ar)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
This is great! Even if it's a bit too small, it still meets the minimum requirements. Too bad it's not that sharp, post-processing would be worthwhile. (Ra) -
WLF 2023
Exceptionally impressive! It's retouched strongly to darken overexposed areas and bring out facial expressions, but it's worth a nomination. Maybe we should add a retouching template with the edits on the file page. (Ra) -
WLF 2023
Maybe we can do a gentle sharpening here and enhance the color contrasts a bit. The motif is well composed. (Ra) -
WLF 2023
I will nomimate this one soon (after improving description/categories). (Ar)
Successful :–) -
WLF 2023
Great. Needs some retouching (e.g. bottom right there are some strange pixelations) and a better description/filename. I will do the changes and nominate it soon. (Ar)
This is extremely impressive, yes, please do! (Kr)
Successful :–) -
WLF 2023
Funny. We must improve description, categories and filename. (Should we make the image a bit brighter?) (Ar)
Looking into description, filename and cats - I leave the brightening to you both (Kr)
Malta[edit]
-
WLF 2023
-
I like the absurdity of the posture and the costume (Kr)
-
Not absolutely sure about the technical quality, but the direct look from those eyes under the costume and facepaint make it very impressive (Kr)
-
And something totally different from Malta - there is a more colorful one as well from the lacemaking, but the focus is much better here (Kr)
Successful :–)
Nepal[edit]
-
WLF 2023
Great shot with obvious wow factor that pushes qualitative flaws like the noise into the background. (Ra)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
People may call it noisy and/or oversaturated, but IMHO it’s great. (Ar)
Edited
Improved derivative, ready for a nomination -
WLF 2023
People may call it noisy and/or oversaturated, but IMHO it’s great. (Ar) -
WLF 2023
Could we carefully reduce the noise (locally, it’s stronger e.g. at the right, not everywhere)? IMHO this is a wonderful photo. (Ar) -
WLF 2023
?! (Ar)
Philippines[edit]
-
WLF 2023
The crop is always a problem with these photos (you always have to crop a person), but this still works for me very well. (Ar) -
WLF 2023
Hm? (Ar) -
WLF 2023
Maybe too dark, but I still love it. Should we create a copy which is a bit brighter and uses a square crop? (Ar)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
This one is my current favourite from the Philippines, I like the faces in the background as well as the way the "Niño" is held up and shown to the world (Kr)
Agree, definitely one of the best. (Ar)
Successful :–) -
WLF 2023
E.g. (Ar)
Other Countries[edit]
-
WLF 2023
(Vietnam)
Wonderful, IMHO one of best WLF photos. Just the resolution is a bit small. But that does no harm to the effect, so we should try it.
Nominated (Kr)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
(Mongolia)
Needs rename. People will call it too dark, but wonderful atmosphere and IMHO very encouraging – a female eagle huntress, wow! (Ar) -
WLF 2023
(Mongolia)
This one has a bit more light, but it’s w/o the eagle. (Ar.) -
WLF 2023
(Spain) -
WLF 2023
(Sri Lanka)
Great proud expression of the man's face, nice capture. Technical flaws are none in my eyes: The noise looks like natural film grain. (Ra)
Successful :) -
WLF 2023
(Israel)
Perhaps too dark, but a very moving image for me (Kr) -
WLF 2023
(Russia)
And another stunning face (Kr)
Failed -
Wikimania 2023
(Singapore)
Image 1/2: Two interesting photos from the ongoing Wiki Loves Living Heritage competition in Singapore, as part of Wikimania 2023. What do you think, do the images seem too posed? In my opinion, worthy of nomination because the technical quality is without any flaws.Personally, I like this first photo most, even though there is a chair back on the lower right side of the picture. (Ra)
Cool, I love all these lamps :–). We should give it a try! (Ar)
Thanks a lot for your evaluation, I guess I'll nominate it later :) (Ra) -
Wikimania 2023
(Singapore)
Image 2/2: Thanks to Cmao20's nomination, I came to the conclusion that I like this version better than the first one because of its more naturalness. (Ra)
Successful :)
WLF previous years[edit]
India[edit]
-
WLF 2022
IMHO very interesting. We could remove the CA. But is it too dark?! -
WLF 2022; or the following:
-
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022
Ist gerade durch Nominierungsprobleme verbrannt worden. Schade. Vielleicht später neutrale Nominerung versuchen? Es gibt noch mehrere Varianten dazu (z.B.), vielleicht ist eine davon gut? -
WLF 2022
Description missing. What is happening here? - Description was improved, will go with this as my next nomination (k)
Unsuccessful :(
Tapas Kumar Halder hat auch zu WLF 2022 zahlreiche Aufnahmen von Inszenierungen indischer Gottheiten und Feste beigetragen, die technisch meist gut sind (manchmal müsste man CAs entfernen). Die Darstellung der Religion kann ich nicht beurteilen, aber auch einfach als Porträt betrachtet sind viele der Bilder gut. Ich finde aber es sehr schwer zu sagen, welche seiner Bilder die besten sind. Hier nur einige gute Beispiele:
Auch für WLF 2023 hat der Fotograf Tapas Kumar Halder großartige Aufnahmen beigetragen, die nicht nur von der technischen Qualität her sehr gut sind:
Malta[edit]
-
WLF 2022
What I like about this picture is that it is so confusing ;–). There is no clear object, it shows the happy chaos of the celebration. -
WLF 2022
Unsuccessful :( -
WLF 2022
Philippines[edit]
-
WLF 2022
I list it because it would be so a great photo, but it’s overprocessed, what a shame. -
WLF 2022
Impressive, but maybe the child is not sharp enough (and people will say it is artificial) …
Unsuccessful :( -
WLF 2022
Probably people will say the crop (bottom etc.) is too narrow; but it’s so expressive … -
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022
Maybe too strong vignetting (darker borders). But still impressive … -
WLF 2022
Looks upscaled. Should we ask the phototograph for the original size?! -
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022 – wäre eines der besten, nur der Focus …
-
WLF 2022
Pots overexposed, I fear. Still a strong image?!? -
WLF 2022
Crop too narrow, I fear. -
WLF 2022
Simple and impressive. Quality not enough for the (rather small) file size?
Unsuccessful :( -
WLF 2022
Wahrscheinlich zu sehr bearbeitet. Aber eindrucksvoll … -
WLF 2022
-
WLF 2022
Thailand[edit]
Varvara Kless-Kaminskaia hat zu WLF 2022 eine ganze Serie von Bildern von Angehörigen der Karen (ethnische Gruppe) beigesteuert, von denen viele schöne Porträts oder “environmental portraits” sind. Es ist gar nicht so einfach, die besten Bilder herauszufinden ;–). Hier eine Vorauswahl, die wir zusammenstreichen sollten:
-
Unsuccessful :(
Ukraine[edit]
-
WLF 2020
-
WLF 2022
Other Countries[edit]
-
WLF 2022
(Bangladesh)
Love it, but probably too noisy/unsharp?! - I also really love this, but it was rejected for exactly those reasosn as QI (k)
Successful :) -
WLF 2022
(Bangladesh)
Probably too noisy etc. But it’s a nightshot and impressive … - I definitely am impressed by this one as well (k) -
WLF 2021
(Bulgaria) -
WLF 2022
(Bulgaria, Mexico) -
WLF 2021
(China)
Maybe people will call it noisy/not enough in focus. But it’s still one of my favourite photos from WLF 2021, it’s so an authentic, classic reportage photo.
Edited version successful :) -
WLF 2022
(Colombia)
I have cropped it. Seems dark, but that’s just classic available light. But probably too noisy?! -
WLF 2020
(Czech Republic) -
WLF 2021
(France) -
WLF 2022
(Ghana)
Cool. Not sharp enough?!? -
WLF 2022
(Ireland) -
WLF 2021
(Kazakhstan) -
WLF 2021
(Mongolia) -
WLF 2021
(Namibia) -
WLF 2022
(Nepal) -
WLF 2022
(North Macedonia) -
WLF 2022
(Peru)
I love the contrast between the traditional bluish clothes and the red phone. But is it too noisy/unsharp? -
WLF 2022
(Peru)
Den Zweig oben kann ich entfernen. Etwas rauschig? Zu touristisch? -
WLF 2022
(Russia)
Sadly, not enough in focus :( I didn't pay attention when selecting it. Remove? (Ra) -
WLF 2021
(Serbia)
Another list[edit]
Diese Liste, die ich dummerweise extra notiert hatte, sollte in die obigen Listen integriert werden, sorry. Es gibt auch Wiederholungen. Ich speichere sie hier trotzdem erst einmal extra, damit ich nicht vollends durcheinanderkomme. (Fast) alle Bilder auf dieser Liste sind aber ausgezeichnet, d.h. (fast) alle dürften gute Kandidaten sein!
-
Nicht erfolgreich :(
-
Schön, aber leider zu klein?! (a)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Schön, aber leider zu klein?! (a)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Ist schon FP ;–)
-
Nicht erfolgreich :(