Commons:Quality images candidates/Archives May 14 2024

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Consensual review[edit]

File:At_Stourhead_2022_027.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination Stourhead House --Mike Peel 07:47, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Promotion
  •  Support Good quality. --Alexander-93 08:27, 8 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Sorry, I have to disagree. Sky is burnt. --Nacaru 10:59, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment Don't think any of the sky is actually burnt/clipped, but a bit of treatment to decrease the highlights in that area would really improve the look of the image IMO. BigDom 03:44, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
    • @Nacaru and BigDom: Brightness redone, does that look better? Thanks. Mike Peel 05:33, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
      •  Support Looks good to me. BigDom 08:45, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:20, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Fixed. Nacaru (talk) 10:46, 11 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 4 support (excluding the nominator), 0 oppose → Promoted   --Robert Flogaus-Faust 21:45, 13 May 2024 (UTC)

File:Mini_Hatch_(J01)_IMG_8799.jpg[edit]

  • Nomination: Mini Hatch (J01) in Böblingen --Alexander-93 07:47, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  • Review
  •  Support Good quality. --GoldenArtists 08:18, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose. The car is very crowded. In addition, the transition between the roof and the light car in the background is barely visible. Incidentally, I find the license plate holder without a license plate unsightly. Please discuss. -- Spurzem 14:02, 2 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Support Not a FP but good quality also regarding the conditions. --Milseburg (talk) 15:05, 7 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Oppose Distracting background. --Kallerna 09:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)
  •  Comment This has been here in CR since 3 May with no result, closing now. BigDom (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)
Total: 2 support (excluding the nominator), 2 oppose → Inconclusive result after 8 consensual review days   --BigDom (talk) 00:02, 12 May 2024 (UTC)