User:ComputerHotline/Archive 7

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-14-hyeres-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality --Ximonic 13:29, 22 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-11-hyeres-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --H005 13:55, 23 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-12-hyeres-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality - Gzzz 09:10, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-11-hyeres-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 09:37, 24 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-12-hyeres-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice --Carschten 13:04, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-25 21-20-41-spines.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- George Chernilevsky 19:32, 26 July 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-25 21-30-17-flower.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 05:44, 27 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Arrivée du grand couloir reliant le fort du Salbert à l'Ouvrage "G", côté Ouvrage "G".jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --H005 21:08, 30 July 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-29-deep-sky-7.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 02:58, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-24-ouvrage-g-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -Gzzz 11:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-24-ouvrage-g-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -Gzzz 11:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-24-ouvrage-g-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -Gzzz 11:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-07-24-ouvrage-g-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. -Gzzz 11:40, 1 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-08 14-50-49-papillon-hunawihr.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Quartl 12:26, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-05 22-07-58-sky.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments a bit noisy, but gorgeous colors --Carschten 14:11, 9 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-09 22-59-35-nuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-09 22-59-32-nuit.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Raghith 07:39, 11 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-13 22-31-35-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice --Ximonic 18:23, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-12-fort-du-lomont-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice! --Ximonic 18:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-12-fort-du-lomont-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality and also interesting to me. --Ximonic 18:35, 14 August 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-12-fort-du-lomont-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI for me--Lmbuga 01:44, 15 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-13 23-00-24-moonlight.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. Please use more descriptive filenames in future, the date is not as relevant to this shot as the location or the subject. --99of9 04:36, 18 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-21 14-53-51-fort-grossherzog-von-baden.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI IMO. --Ankara 11:38, 23 August 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 09-49-18-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good -- Jean-Pol GRANDMONT 20:39, 5 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 09-46-19-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Pas de doute, tu fais ça très bien.--Jebulon 14:19, 6 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 11-19-57-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 11-01-46-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:25, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 10-11-49-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Andrei Stroe 08:18, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-38-09-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-25-46-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-22-07-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-13-46-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-08-41-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-08-30 16-07-21-grottes-Réclère.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Impossible to judge, too similar names of files and nominations with the others of the same subject. After 3 mistakes, I give up.--Jebulon 13:24, 4 September 2011 (UTC)
 Support - Nice. --Mattbuck 23:47, 9 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-10 10-42-10-gouttes.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality, but next time please don't upload 4 almost identical pictures.--Someone35 11:42, 11 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 10-36-24-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Vassil 11:01, 13 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-03 10-15-59-fort-lomont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. And next time don't upload tons of pictures with the same subject and file name please. --Someone35 13:08, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-12 16-33-00-eglise-Saint-Dizier-l-eveque.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality--Lmbuga 09:44, 14 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-10 10-22-28-ecole-j-heidet.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support oui.--Jebulon 12:01, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-12 16-46-20-puits-bal-croix.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Un peu trop contrasté, mais bonne image quand même. Sujet intéressant! -- MJJR 09:40, 17 September 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion[edit]

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-09-18 16-05-35-fort-arches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments very nice and technical super --Ralf Roletschek 09:49, 21 September 2011 (UTC)