User:ComputerHotline/Archive 5

From Wikimedia Commons, the free media repository
Jump to navigation Jump to search

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-10.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp and beautiful light --Croucrou 19:49, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:35, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-03-ouv-essert-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Sharp, good composition --Croucrou 18:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-03-ouv-essert-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments sharp, beautiful colors --Croucrou 18:14, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-01-f-bois-d-oye-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments beautiful lighting --Croucrou 18:17, 9 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-12.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 16:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice symmetrical composition --Carschten 16:52, 10 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Gravure-fort-b-perches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --David Perez 18:27, 13 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-6.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Slightly strange effect makes it seem wonky when it's not, maybe a bit bright, but good generally. --Mattbuck 13:06, 17 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-16-f-lomont-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Very nice !! --Jebulon 00:09, 19 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-10.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-10.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:00, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

FP Promotion

[edit]
This image has been promoted to Featured picture!

The image File:2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-3.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:2011-03-09-fort-du-lomont-3.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 22:01, 21 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-16-f-lomont-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 21:45, 20 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-20-fort-lomont-9.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 22:31, 23 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-24-f-lachaux-1.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. minor CA in the upper right corner but thats ok. --Jovianeye 22:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-25-f-lachaux-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Jovianeye 22:45, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-24-f-lachaux-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 09:06, 28 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-24-f-lachaux-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 08:11, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-25-f-lachaux-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-25-f-lachaux-2.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 08:14, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-20-fort-lomont-8.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Nice and interesting light.--Jebulon 22:09, 30 March 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-30-fort-hautes-perches-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-03-30-fort-hautes-perches-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 18:59, 2 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron-04.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments I believe that this image fits in our standards. --Grand-Duc 02:50, 6 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron-06.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron-09.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 19:20, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Pano-belfort-vu-des-perches.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Cayambe 07:15, 7 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-redoute-st-apoll 03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Jovianeye 16:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron-03.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI. --Jovianeye 16:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments QI --Jovianeye 16:03, 8 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grottes-crav-5.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 11:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grottes-crav-4.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Coyau 11:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! Grottes-crav-3.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. The spotlight almost gives a sense of scale. --Coyau 11:19, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-redoute-st-apoll.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good. --Cayambe 19:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 2011-04-03-fort-motte-giron-07.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Ok to me. --Cayambe 19:35, 11 April 2011 (UTC)

Nous avons fait figurer votre image sur notre blog, illustrant le musée de Belfort.

[edit]

www.armae.com/blog

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 16-41-30-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments  Support QI for me --Archaeodontosaurus 15:12, 16 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-48-53-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Mbdortmund 10:18, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-30-00-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. -- King of Hearts 08:27, 18 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-33-45-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good.--Ankara 12:42, 20 April 2011 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

[edit]
Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 13-30-31-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments nice --Carschten 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 14-57-41-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-15-04-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted

Congratulations! 15-50-47-fort-parmont.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status.

If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates.

We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images.
Comments Good quality. --Carschten 20:43, 21 April 2011 (UTC)