User:ComputerHotline/Archive 11

Quelques macros avec mon NEX-5N...

Celle de gauche

Bonjour ! J'ai pris des macro "nature" au début du mois (loin de la qualité des tiennes, bien sûre) et je les est proposées en image de qualité. J'ai également pris mon NEX-5N et mon Exilim en photo pour te les montrer. Pour une première et avec un 18/55, c'est plutôt pas mal non ? Bourgeois.A (talk) 21:27, 23 June 2012 (UTC)

• 
• 
• 
• 
• 
• 

Un zoom n'est pas du tout indiqué pour faire ce genre de photo. Cela se voit car elles manquent de piqué. La macro est un domaine spécifique de la photo requiérant des optiques spécifiques. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:26, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Je le sais, mais je voulais juste faire un essais pour voir et je trouve le résultat agréable à regarder. Mais à chaque fois que je présente une image à quelqu'un sur commons, il me parle systématiquement QUE des point négatif, à l'inverse quelqu’un que je côtoie tout les jours me dira QUE des choses positives (même un possesseur de reflex)... Pourquoi personne ne détails objectivement mes clichés + et - ? Chaque personne me parle d'un truc différent ! Enfin bref, oublions ça, j'ai une question beaucoup plus intéressante : A-tu du matérielle d’éclairage pour réalisé des light paintig à la Michel Séméniako ? Si oui, j’aurais une idée originale de photo à te proposer... Bourgeois.A (talk) 11:30, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai uniquement une maglite. --ComputerHotline (talk) 19:16, 24 June 2012 (UTC)

Savais-tu que le NEX-5N dispose des modes experts (P,S,A,M) et qu'il peut prendre des poses longues jusqu’à 30 secondes ? Quant je m'en suis aperçu hier, j'ai passé toute la soiré à faire des "lightpainting" avec une lampe de poche Varta (7 LED blanche très puissante) et des matières transparentes colorés. Je suis aussi aller dehors pour faire de long motif en agitant une lampe sur une certaine distance. Je ne savais même pas que mon boîtier pouvait faire ça ! Pour revenir à ma question, je voudrais te proposer de faire chacun un petit lightpaintig sur la grande façade sud du bâtiment de la machine du puits Artur A. On peut tout les deux essayé avant la fin de l'année (ou une autre période si tu le souhaite) de réaliser un light painting d'une seule pose en 30 secondes. On pourra mettre nos deux images sur commons et les comparer. Qu'est-ce-que tu en pense ? Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:31, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Aucun souci. Reste à définir une date en fonction de la météo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:39, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Le jeudi soire semble pas mal, si les orages de vendredi ne viennent pas trop tôt. Tu pourrais aussi essayer ce genre de cliché, ça rendrai bien je pense :

• 
• 

J'en doute fort : 1) la lune est basse sur l'horizon en cette saison et 2) le site est en pleine forêt. --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

La partie Sud-Est où se trouve cette façade est bien dégagé, il n'y a pas d'arbre tout dépend de la position de la lune, si, elle est au Nord, c'est sur que ce n'est pas bon. L'idéal serait le sud. Sinon prorpose un autre moment de l'année plus adapté Bourgeois.A (talk) 12:49, 25 June 2012 (UTC) Sinon, il suffit de prendre les lightpaintings jeudi et d'attendre un moment plus favorbale pour la photo au claire de Lune. Bourgeois.A (talk) 13:43, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Après les light paintings, ce soire, je fait des HDR et c'est géniale ! Finalement, nos APN ne sont pas si éloigné que ça ! Savais tu que le que le NEX-5N pouvais faire autant de choses ? Quand je pense qu'au départ j'était déçus de ne pas avoir de pose longues et de HDR, tout est oublié maintenant. Je vais passer toute l'après-midi de jeudi au puits Arthur et ça promet ! Je te montrerais les meilleurs clichés, j'ai hâte ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 20:54, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Non, je ne savais pas, comme indiqué plus haut, je ne connais pas les hybrides car je n'en n'ai jamais eu en main. J'ai hâte de voir tes clichés. --ComputerHotline (talk) 07:22, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai reguardé la météo pour Belfort, Lure, Vesoul et Besançon. Finalement il fera un bien meilleur temps demain (après-midi et soiré) que jeudi ou il risque de pleuvoire dé le matin. A confirmer... on en reparlera demain matin. Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

Si la météo ne s’éclaircit pas cet après-midi, il va falloir tout repousser jusqu’à début juillet où le 4 et le 5 devraient êtres pas mal. Je te redis ça cet après-midi. Si on trouve la bonne soirée, à quel heure faut-il être présent sur le site pour faire un light painting ? Bourgeois.A (talk) 07:57, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

A la tombée de la nuit, vers 23h. Ceci dit, je ne sais pas si je serai là. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:51, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Début juillet ? Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:59, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Je ne sais pas encore. Ceci dit, rien ne t'empêche d'essayer seul ce soir. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:04, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Pfffff ! Je suis lessivé : je viens de passer plus de 3h au puits Arthur (les 3/4 du temps en sous-sol). Je me suis éclaté, j'ai pris des HDR, des poses longues, des light painting avec le mode S et même des photos "normal" avec le mode auto intelligent. Je n'est plus le courage de sortir de chez moi ! Demain je metrais quelques photos sur commons... notament des sous-sol de la grand salle des machines avec des couloirs de 30 cm de large. C'était imprésionant là dessous. Pour conclure : avec mon NEX, mon trepied, ma lampe + 2/3 autre truques, je fais ENFIN de la vraie photo d'URBEX ! Bourgeois.A (talk) 18:08, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai hâte de voir cela. Quant à moi, je serai aux eurockéennes vendredi, samedi et dimanche. Plus précisément, à la maison de l'environnement. Amène ton matos et mitrailles les artistes (sans flash). Cela vaudra le coup. --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

J'ai mis les images sur ma PU de commons ! Je tiens à précisé que je n'est pas ton expérience et que ma lampe, bien qu’ efficace n’atteint pas le niveau d'une maglite. Il faut bien sûr faire des critiques négatives pour que je progresse, mais trouve aussi des choses positives à dire... Bourgeois.A (talk) 08:03, 28 June 2012 (UTC) PS : est-ce-que tu peux désormais m'ajouter dans ta liste "More good photographers / D'autres photographes talentueux :"?

Pour un premier jet, ces clichés sont prometteurs. Ceci dit, pour les HDR, il faut que tu fasses plusieurs photos (> à 6 dans une scène comme ceci [1]) sur trépied en ne décalant que le temps de pose. Ensuite, fusionne le tout dans un logiciel dédié (Photomatix, Luminance HDR,...). Ainsi, tu n'auras quasiment plus de blanc cramé ni de noirs bouché. Pour le reste, c'est ok. Sauf peut-être le cadrage. --ComputerHotline (talk) 09:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Pour les lightpaintings sur la façade, je pense qu'il serait plus judicieux d'attendre début 2013, à la fin de l'hiver, pour mieux voir. La végétation prend de plus en plus se place... Bourgeois.A (talk) 12:01, 28 June 2012 (UTC) Bravo ! ça, 'est de l'art :

Merci. En effet, je pense que la fin d'hiver convient mieux à cet endroit. --ComputerHotline (talk) 12:37, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-24 16-29-59-fort-chat-lamb-mag-roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very nice! --Florstein 19:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-24 16-20-16-fort-chat-lamb-mag-roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI to me. --Florstein 19:01, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-24 16-34-39-fort-chat-lamb-mag-roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 21:53, 25 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-07 16-00-52-Lestes-sp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Pyrrhosoma nymphula

Hello. I would like to inform you about using of your work on my website. Here is the link to your photo: Timing. Greetings.

Thanks. --ComputerHotline (talk) 06:41, 29 June 2012 (UTC)

Used your photo

I used your photo, thanks! http://blurbmyenthusiasm.com/2012/07/01/the-universe-is-at-it-again/ Let me know if I need to add any additional credits.

Yes : a link to the page of the photo [2] --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:40, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-02 10-08-18-fort-miotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-02 10-22-45-fort-miotte 02.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 10:54, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-02 10-23-57-fort-miotte.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good. -- JLPC 08:34, 30 June 2012 (UTC)

Macro

Bonjour ComputerHotline !

J'ai vue sur internet que beaucoup de personnes utilisaient cet objectif : [3] pour prendre des macros avec les NEX-7 et NEX-5N. En plus il est compatible monture E sans bague adaptatrice. Qu'est-ce-que tu en pense ? (ne fait pas celui qui ne connait pas, je te parle uniquement de l'objectif en lui même pour la macro)Bourgeois.A (talk) 11:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

qui es-tu ? --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:28, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

C'est moi Bourgeois.A (talk) 11:07, 3 July 2012 (UTC) J'ai oublié de signé (regarde l'historique) !

Je n'en pense rien : je ne le connais pas. Fouille au niveau des tests éventuellement dispo. --ComputerHotline (talk) 11:29, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

Voilà : [4]. Ce test réuni le 19 et le 30 mm. C'est le ganre de macro qui m'interesse. Bourgeois.A (talk) 11:45, 3 July 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-07-04 22-34-23-orage-belfort.jpg

Hi ComputerHotline, nice shot. However, in order to categorize it correctly, is this a montage or how do I have to understand your comment in French in the description? --Túrelio (talk) 08:16, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

It's not a montage, but a stacking of individuals photos. --ComputerHotline (talk) 08:36, 5 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-06-19 17-30-07-f-chat-lambert-mag-ss-roc.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:02, 2 July 2012 (UTC)

ebook

Dear Thomas I am a science journalist producing an ebook on plants. I would like to use your picture: http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012-04-03_16-43-53-amaryllis-sp.jpg I will give you full credit (name, website etc.). My questions: 1. Could you give me permission to use your image? 2. What do you want in the byline credit? Thanks for getting back to me: mail@atlant.ch Atlant Bieri

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-04 00-48-54-nightscape.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Beautiful. --Selbymay 16:27, 4 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-17 18-22-42-Chalcolestes viridis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-17 18-18-23-Sympetrum sanguineum.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 20:02, 18 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-17 13-30-54-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality and nice colors. --Tomer T 12:48, 19 July 2012 (UTC)

2012-06-05 15-25-42-diptera.jpg

I identified this series of photos as Temnostoma vespiforme but until I get to the museum I can't be sure about the species (cf.= compare with). Temnostoma genus is 100% correct (cf.= compare with) Very nice photos Notafly (talk) 19:59, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

FP Promotion

★ This image has been promoted to Featured picture! ★ The image File:Wandkarte von Süd-West-Deutschland.jpg, that you nominated on Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Wandkarte von Süd-West-Deutschland.jpg has been promoted. Thank you for your contribution. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so.

/FPCBot (talk) 13:06, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 11-42-57-pano-vu-du-kastelberg.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Óðinn 00:33, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 15-16-40-Danaus plexippus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 14-34-33-Idea leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 14-36-37-Idea leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 18:31, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-22 15-33-24-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. -- JLPC 09:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-22 15-37-00-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments  Support Good quality. --JLPC 09:03, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-22 16-50-51-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 09:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-22 16-53-56-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 09:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-22 16-10-08-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 09:39, 25 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 15-33-53-Danaus plexippus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Holleday 17:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 14-35-55-Idea leuconoe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Holleday 17:58, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-17 18-22-11-Chalcolestes viridis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-17 18-21-57-Chalcolestes viridis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 15:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-25 17-12-16-Volucella.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Nice--Holleday 15:56, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 15-33-07-Danaus plexippus.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty. --Mattbuck 13:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 11-51-26-pierre-frontiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Mattbuck 13:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-20 12-03-44-Borne frontiere.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments OK, though I think the focus should be further away. --Mattbuck 13:50, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-25 15-52-05-Chalcolestes viridis.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 12:18, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-25 16-50-44-apis-mellifera.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Stu Phillips 12:25, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-01 22-29-07-orage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Pretty bloody awesome. --Mattbuck 12:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-01 22-01-31-orage.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 05:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-31 22-55-29-m31-29f-30d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Could you please add a note where is the galaxy? Yann 05:55, 6 August 2012 (UTC) QI for me --Haneburger 07:05, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-07-26 22-00-15-moon.ogv, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments {{{3}}}

Astronomy pictures

Hi! I'm sorry that a lot of you astronomical pictures don't get QI or FP status, most of us haven't ever tried to take such pictures and we don't know how difficult it is and how good a picture should be, and therefore we are unable to "judge" your photos. But thank you very much for your work, it's very interesting. I have some constellations pictures and I even tried Jupiter once, just a brown spot haha. --Kadellar (talk) 16:16, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

By the way, do you know if I could attach the Canon G11 to a refracting telescope? Thank you!! --Kadellar (talk) 16:24, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

G11 is not compatible with digiscoping. --ComputerHotline (talk) 05:25, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-12 18-52-39-clouds.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Impressive crepuscular rays. --King of Hearts 03:19, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-12 17-24-01-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-12 17-22-35-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-12 17-20-41-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-11 23-56-28-Cassiopeia-2c-27f-28d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-11 23-46-33-iss.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Interesting, and very good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-11 17-05-15-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-11 17-01-49-sun-halpha.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Yann 09:43, 15 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-11 23-56-28-Cassiopeia-ann-2c-27f-28d.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI. Is Andromeda included? --Kadellar 16:07, 15 August 2012 (UTC) Not here. --ComputerHotline 05:23, 16 August 2012 (UTC)

Unidentified flowers?

Please be more careful with categories. The flowers in this poster and this one are identified. Alvesgaspar (talk) 10:12, 31 August 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-31 16-03-27-fort-salb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-31 15-38-50-fort-salb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 08:01, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-08-31 16-10-11-fort-salb.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 12:03, 1 September 2012 (UTC)

Tagging of derivative light works

Hi Thomas, would you mind being a bit more explanative to new users who upload their content to Commons during WLM, especially if the monuments are "old" and just the light is "new"? You may refer to our image casebook or anything else that helps them. Thanks and best regards -- Rillke^(q?) 17:28, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

What is the problem ??? The Eiffel tower by night ??? --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:31, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

The problem is that this is a complex matter of copyright that new users have difficulties to understand. -- Rillke^(q?) 17:37, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

So, it's illegal to upload some pictures because there are sometimes some author rights on the subject of the photography. --ComputerHotline (talk) 17:39, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

That's right. All I ask you is explaining this to new users. Especially if they come from France since you are a native French speaker. I had serious difficulties to explain this (in French) for example here: User talk:Gérald Martinez (enquiry here: File talk:Lyon - Fontaine des Jacobins..JPG) -- Rillke^(q?) 17:49, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

It's not me who make laws. I repeat : It's illegal to upload some pictures because there are sometimes some author rights on the subject of the photography. For example : the Eiffel tower by night, the Louvre pyramid, the Chapelle de Ronchamp,... --ComputerHotline (talk) 18:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Fine. I understood and you made your point clear. You are not willing. -- Rillke^(q?) 19:21, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Si tu comptes proposer en suppression tout les bâtiments illuminés de France, ne serait-il pas plus clair et efficace de carrément proposé à la suppression la catégorie Category:Illuminated buildings in France. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 10:27, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Ce n'est qu'une application du code de la propriété intellectuelle. Tout comme il est interdit de diffuser des photos de la tour Eiffel de nuit. --ComputerHotline (talk) 10:52, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Si tu crois à ce que tu dis, vas-y je ne peux ni ne veux t'en empêcher. La seule chose de claire dans cette histoire c'est que ce n'est pas clair. Presque toute les RFD récentes sur les bâtiments illuminés se sont terminées par une conservation (même dans des cas).

Pour la tour Eiffel de nuit, la seule chose de claire sont les prétentions de la SETE et la jurisprudence. Il n’est pas franchement certain que ces prétentions soient légitimes et la jurisprudence ne s'applique pas aux illuminations mais au spectacle de son et lumière. Cdlt, VIGNERON (talk) 11:22, 6 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 15-45-47-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 08:46, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 16-44-01-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 16-14-47-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:50, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 15-29-13-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Poco a poco 19:30, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 15-15-18-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good photo. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)

Photo "Abeille" JR-Blog

Dear Mr. Bresson, I would like to inform you about using of your work in my Blog: "Insecte sur une fleur de chardon (abeille)". Here is the link to your photo: http://www.janreichow.de/wordpress/?p=9917 I hope you agree. Thanks! jan.reichow@t-online.de

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-04 17-12-31-PA00101135-cath-st-christophe.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Florstein 16:40, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-05 11-20-58-cat-st-christophe-PA00101135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality -- Lothar Spurzem 19:00, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-05 11-24-11-cat-st-christophe-PA00101135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JDP90 16:55, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-05 11-31-38-cat-st-christophe-PA00101135.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Ralf Roletschek 22:30, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 15-57-20-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. --Florstein 16:22, 4 September 2012 (UTC)  Comment Does the photo show true colours? I can't imagine. -- Lothar Spurzem 00:06, 5 September 2012 (UTC) Yes, it's the true colors. --ComputerHotline 12:05, 5 September 2012 (UTC)

http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012-07-25_15-50-06-serpent.jpg?uselang=cs

Hello Thomas, I´m a Teacher in Czech Republik. I´d like use your foto http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2012-07-25_15-50-06-serpent.jpg?uselang=cs in my presentation for 10 years old children. Thank you for your answer. My email: patek05@seznam.cz R.

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 16-03-52-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 16:34, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Droit d'auteur sur les illuminations

Bonjour,

La Tour Eiffel est un cas spécial. Seul le spectacle organisé pour le bicentenaire a un droit d'auteur. Jusqu’à preuve du contraire, il n'y a pas de droit d'auteur sur les illuminations. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 13:15, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Ce n'est pas ce que dit la cour de cassation. --ComputerHotline (talk) 13:29, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Cet arrêt de cour de cassation porte justement sur le spectacle du bi-centenaire, c'est d'ailleurs pas la SETE qui "gagne" mais la société La Mode en Image (responsable du spectacle). --PierreSelim (talk) 09:07, 14 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-02 16-18-12-PA00135351-fort-giromagny.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --King of Hearts 19:02, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-09 17-47-06-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Very good. "Smells" FP, maybe...--Jebulon 15:08, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-09 17-39-41-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --JLPC 15:28, 13 September 2012 (UTC)

Butterfly species

Hello ComputerHotline, thanks for being there, I made all moves and updated all descriptions. We wondered why its tail was so long... Poco a poco (talk) 21:01, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

File:2012-09-12 17-04-00-Micromys minutus-part1.ogv

Bonjour,

J'ai ajouté ton film dans les Commons:Média du jour. Il reste des jours libres en septembre, et octobre est presque vide. Cordialement, Yann (talk) 11:00, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-09 17-30-36-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-09 17-52-01-nd-bas-ronchamp.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments QI for me. --Kadellar 13:00, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Quality Image Promotion

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-14 14-30-23-bat-caisse-d-epargne.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --JLPC 20:47, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-14 14-24-36-PA00101680-Maison Forstner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-14 14-23-30-PA00101680-Maison Forstner.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-14 15-05-00-PA00101784-egl-st-maimboeuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. --Iifar 11:47, 18 September 2012 (UTC)

Your image has been reviewed and promoted Congratulations! 2012-09-14 15-01-04-PA00101784-egl-st-maimboeuf.jpg, which was produced by you, was reviewed and has now been promoted to Quality Image status. If you would like to nominate another image, please do so at Quality images candidates. We also invite you to take part in the categorization of recently promoted quality images. Comments Good quality. - A.Savin 19:33, 17 September 2012 (UTC)

Used your image Morpho peleides 1.jpg

Hello, we created geometric repeating patterns in SymmetryMill from your beautiful Morpho peleides: [[5]]. Thanks!