Commons:Featured picture candidates/Image:Synchiropus splendidus 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

Image:Synchiropus splendidus 1 Luc Viatour.jpg

Original - not featured

•  Info created by Luc Viatour - uploaded by Luc Viatour - nominated by -- Luc Viatour 22:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Luc Viatour 22:43, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I think it's wonderful! --Dsmurat 23:21, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support, it is definitely noisy, but the composition and colours are so great that I can't bring myself to do anything else than supporting. --Aqwis 23:56, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Comment Has this photo been retouched? Because it looks almost like a watercolour painting. Adam Cuerden 04:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • It was in an aquarium, but the fish is even more beautiful in real life.I adjusted the color balance to offset artificial light and remove noise iso (1600 iso) --Luc Viatour 08:02, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Laziale93 08:52, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Noisy, not very high detail and sharpness. --Beyond silence 09:15, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • C'est un sujet difficile à photographier. Je n'ai pas trouvé équivalant libre et de bonne qualité. Le poisson est petit et dans l'eau ou derrière une vitre, il est très difficile d'avoir mieux. --Luc Viatour 10:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Nice composition, but quite noisy and insufficient DOF. I much more like the alternative. Lycaon 09:43, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • The quality of the alternative is better, aesthetically, but I find it best. I submit another if it is not selected.--Luc Viatour 10:09, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support A difficult situation with only very few light. The composition is great (also true for the alternative version) --AngMoKio 12:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose Ack Lycaon. Try nominating the alternative version. Freedom to share 13:05, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Noise wouldn't be visible on a photoprint. Outstanding picture :-) --Richard Bartz 17:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- MJJR 21:37, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great composition and colours. Chmehl 07:07, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Goele 14:50, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose. Ack Lycaon. --TM 16:32, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose ack opposers above. --Dori - Talk 19:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Neutral Quite like this, but prefer the alternative Julesn84 03:34, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose A difficult picture, but I fear the colours have been oversaturated. --MichaelMaggs 17:51, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Wonderful composition, this could easily be downsampled to reduce the noise. Calibas 23:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --B.navez 16:44, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Good subject, nice colours --Alipho 18:50, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

13 support, 1neutral, 6 oppose >> not featured (alternative version featured) - Alvesgaspar 10:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)

Alternative - featured

•  Support Lycaon 13:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support also gets my vote. --AngMoKio 13:12, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support--Luc Viatour 14:01, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Wisnia6522 14:13, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Aqwis 14:33, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Much better in many aspects, including DOF. Freedom to share 15:58, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Nice colour.（＾＾）／ -- Laitche 16:10, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose I prefer the original --Richard Bartz 17:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Question Hi Luc. Do you have a graphics tablet ? -- Laitche 19:38, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
  • No I do not have a graphics tablet! I did not fish painted by hand as it was already this ;) --Luc Viatour 05:16, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
    • I mean that device is very convenient, especially on partial editing (partial noise reduction, etc), I assure.（＾＾）／ -- Laitche 06:12, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support -- Goele 14:49, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Karelj 21:30, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Julesn84 03:35, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Oppose A difficult picture, but I fear the colours have been oversaturated causing CA. See in particular the artefact line around the outline of the lips. --MichaelMaggs 17:50, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support I like this one too, though the composition isn't quite as good. Calibas 23:39, 18 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support --Lerdsuwa 08:28, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
•  SupportZimbres 20:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support Great picture! And I must admit a bit of disappointment. I have images of a pair of these mating taken at Lembeh straits last November which I have been meaning to upload, but don't see the point now. In the wild, underwater, there would be no match to this. Well done sir. --Jnpet 20:22, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
•  Support great --Mbdortmund 14:52, 22 March 2008 (UTC)

15 support, 2 oppose >> featured - Alvesgaspar 10:51, 26 March 2008 (UTC)