Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tolbachik.jpg

File:Tolbachik.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 20 Feb 2022 at 20:15:33 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Tolbachik.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Tolbachik.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District
•  Info created by Anton Korablev - uploaded by Anton Korablev - nominated by JukoFF -- JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- JukoFF (talk) 20:15, 11 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Comment If we could crop that distracting unsharp area from the bottom and accentuate the horizontals more, I'd support. Daniel Case (talk) 22:25, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

  this is the distracting that shows the rarity of volcanoes on the Kamchatka plane:) JukoFF (talk) 00:44, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose as is. I might well support if the edits Daniel suggested are made. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 01:32, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

• Unfortunately, I don't know how to do that :( JukoFF (talk) 21:35, 12 February 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose The mountains are amazing; however, I'm okay with there being a bit of a blurry area in the foreground but this is just too much Cmao20 (talk) 07:47, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
• @JukoFF, Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek, and Cmao20: I have created a simple cropped version: File:Tolbachik (cropped).jpg. What do you think? Is it better? Should we crop more or less? (IMHO it’s difficult to determinate the best bottom crop in this case; we must include at least a part of the unsharp foreground.) Best, --Aristeas (talk) 10:46, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

 Comment That's a whole lot better, but I'm not sure whether I'd vote for it. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 11:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

 Comment I would vote for this version. Cmao20 (talk) 11:26, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

+1 Daniel Case (talk) 13:37, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Daniel Case, Ikan Kekek, and Cmao20: Thank you very much for your comments! OK, so it seems reasonable to provide this one as alternative version … --Aristeas (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

@Aristeas: , thank you so much for your responsiveness! JukoFF (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)

You are welcome ;–). --Aristeas (talk) 10:52, 15 February 2022 (UTC)

Alternative

•  Support The cropped version accentuates the horizontals better and emphasizes the impressive features of the landscape. --Aristeas (talk) 18:04, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Tournasol7 (talk) 18:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 19:31, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support JukoFF (talk) 20:54, 14 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 07:48, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support--Llez (talk) 08:41, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:14, 15 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 09:11, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Fischer.H (talk) 15:53, 16 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --Veikk0.ma (talk) 11:38, 19 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support --IamMM (talk) 04:56, 20 February 2022 (UTC)
•  Support.--Vulp❯❯❯here! 17:11, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 12 support, 0 oppose, 0 neutral → featured. /--A.Savin 23:10, 20 February 2022 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Natural/Russia#Far Eastern Federal District

The chosen alternative is: File:Tolbachik (cropped).jpg