Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The windmills of Kinderdijk.JPG

File:The windmills of Kinderdijk.JPG, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 10 May 2015 at 09:05:44 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:The windmills of Kinderdijk.JPG Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:The windmills of Kinderdijk.JPG

• Category: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture
•  Info created & uploaded by Tarod - nominated by Tomer T -- Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support -- Tomer T (talk) 09:05, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
  • Please don't count my vote as a support, to compensate for LuisArmandoRasteletti's vote. Tomer T (talk) 20:52, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Excellent composition and nice lighting but the details are lost by processing(sharp, denoise, etc) in my opinion, sorry. --Laitche (talk) 16:33, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support. Agree with Laitche that this is not the sharpest. But there is so much "wow" in this image that I'm comfortable asking myself, does this look perfectly sharp at 2000 px? Yes it does. --King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:00, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
• Weak  Support Per KoH, the cropped Windmill sail at the bottom is also a pity Poco² 09:03, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Comment The King's comment means this one, but I don't think that one is perfectly sharp(details) and still there are a bit noises on the grasses at the right side + downscaling is a minus factor + this is already downscaled(3901 / 4608 x 3072 = 2601). --Laitche (talk) 09:24, 2 May 2015 (UTC) --Laitche (talk) 18:41, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Soundwaweserb (talk) 13:41, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support 😄 ArionEstar 😜 (talk) 16:15, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Disturbing tight crop at top and cut reflection at the bottom. -- Christian Ferrer 16:19, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --LuisArmandoRasteletti (talk) 22:58, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the composition but for my taste it's unfortunately not sharp enough to give a support. --Code (talk) 05:32, 4 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Support --Tremonist (talk) 13:02, 5 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Neutral I like the lighting and the composition is excellent, imho (don't really mind the cut wing). Sharpness is not bad for a kit lens, but a decent prime would probably have yielded a much better result. Sorry, I really can't decide. --El Grafo (talk) 09:55, 6 May 2015 (UTC)
•  Oppose Quality not high enough for FP landscape. Disagree with KoH that we should be happy with a 2MP sharp for landscape -- plenty 36MP FPC failures would pass at that standard. -- Colin (talk) 12:30, 7 May 2015 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 6 support, 3 oppose, 2 neutral → not featured. /-- Christian Ferrer 17:25, 10 May 2015 (UTC)