Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Chorizos-asador.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Chorizos-asador.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 24 May 2022 at 19:40:48 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Food and drink#Food : Processing, preparing and cooking
Info all by me Ezarate -- Ezarateesteban 19:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- Ezarateesteban 19:40, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose - Likely a useful image, but there technical/"wow" parts are not quite there for me. — Rhododendrites talk | 13:07, 16 May 2022 (UTC)- Support For my part I like it -- it's appetizing, unusual, and has good quality. Hope our Muslim and Jewish colleagues are not offended here --A.Savin 13:22, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Unusual, interesting and educational --Kritzolina (talk) 18:37, 16 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose This feels like the prototype Wikipedia image: It is indeed unusual, interesting and educational. It is also mostly fine technically. But photographically speaking, it is just a straight snap shot with the primary compositional idea being to fill the frame with as much of the subject as possible. VI, maybe QI, possibly Wikipedia FP, but no Commons FP for me. --El Grafo (talk) 08:14, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 09:15, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose like El Grafo --Stepro (talk) 09:37, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others, very illustrative but IMO the image quality is not there. Cmao20 (talk) 19:08, 17 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Far too noisy even if it were aesthetically striking enough. Daniel Case (talk) 16:55, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see noise in the picture Ezarateesteban 17:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Me too would be curious to know where noise is. --A.Savin 18:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- I thought the picture noisy at first glance as well, but then realized that it is the hot air from the fire that is creating these effects. Could it be that this is also what you see as noisy, Daniel Case? Kritzolina (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- @Kritzolina, Ezarate, A.Savin I can see it and I think it's a bit of both. There's certainly some heat involved in the centre, but that does not explain the slightly strange look of the grass or the sausage surfaces, for example. Feels like a bit too much de-noising being countered by a bit too much sharpening (or the other way round). You can see that quite well when zooming in to the face of the log on the left: The fine details get a bit fuzzy with some of the flatter areas in-between being almost posterized. That alone probably would not keep me from supporting, though. El Grafo (talk) 10:45, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
- I thought the picture noisy at first glance as well, but then realized that it is the hot air from the fire that is creating these effects. Could it be that this is also what you see as noisy, Daniel Case? Kritzolina (talk) 06:02, 20 May 2022 (UTC)
- Me too would be curious to know where noise is. --A.Savin 18:45, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- I don't see noise in the picture Ezarateesteban 17:13, 19 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support I looked at this picture several times and each time I find it more interesting. There is wow for me. -- IamMM (talk)
Confirmed results:
Result: 4 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 22:18, 24 May 2022 (UTC)
