Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monk on mountain path, Dharamsala (1).jpg

File:Buddhist monk on mountain path, Dharamsala (1).jpg, not featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 12 May 2022 at 14:52:58 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monk on mountain path, Dharamsala (1).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Buddhist monk on mountain path, Dharamsala (1).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/People
•  Info created by Artemas Liu - uploaded by B2Belgium - nominated by UnpetitproleX -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- UnpetitproleX (talk) 14:52, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Is this one of the very best photos on the site? I'd like a second opinion about that. But I like the warm light, the greenery, the inviting path in front of the viewer and the possibility of thinking of oneself as the monk climbing the path. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 22:17, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

  I like the visual of the monk going through what almost feels like a tunnel. It may not the best image in the technical aspects, yes, but I like the composition and the somewhat liminal feel of it. UnpetitproleX (talk) 23:32, 3 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Oppose Bad light with very dark parts, too contrasted and the foreground is out of focus -- Basile Morin (talk) 23:51, 3 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 16:19, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Support Cmao20 (talk) 23:40, 4 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose The balance of light and dark does not work for me in this case unfortunately, even though I like the idea behind this shot a lot --Kritzolina (talk) 06:13, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Harsh midday lighting, nothing special for me. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:23, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose I didn't mind the lighting; I thought it was actually great as a visual metaphor. I found that the trees at the left didn't bother me as much as I thought they woulld. But then ... there was the horrible unsharpness in the foreground. We can't approve an FP with that. Great idea though, still. Daniel Case (talk) 02:59, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

•  Comment Good argument. I'd consider pulling my vote, but it doesn't look like this nomination will pass, anyway. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 14:54, 7 May 2022 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 4 support, 4 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /Basile Morin (talk) 01:19, 13 May 2022 (UTC)