Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Поляницький регіональний парк. Скелі Довбуша.jpg
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
File:Поляницький регіональний парк. Скелі Довбуша.jpg, not featured
[edit]
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 14 May 2022 at 13:43:46 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.
- Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Natural#Ukraine
Info created and uploaded by Пивовар Павло - nominated by IamMM -- IamMM (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)
Support -- IamMM (talk) 13:43, 5 May 2022 (UTC)- Support A spectacular view in beautiful morning light. The technical quality is not perfect, but very good (nitpicking: there are some minor CAs in the corners, but we have promoted photos with much more prominent CAs; if the CAs are a problem, I can try to fix them). IMHO there are two questions. (1) Sharpness: The focus was obviously more on the foreground and the background seems less sharp. However the trees on the rocks in the midground are still sharp, therefore I think the apparent unsharpness of the background is mostly due to the morning mist, so OK. (2) This photo seems almost too good to be true ;–). Has the photographer overprocessed it? It’s obvious that the saturation is high, but all in all the colours are appropriate for the season (autumn foliage) and the daytime (warm light of the raising sun). Therefore the photographer may have increased the saturation etc. in post-processing, but IMHO the result is still realistic and sensible. --Aristeas (talk) 06:54, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Thank you very much for your analysis and convincing argumentation, Aristeas. -- Radomianin (talk) 07:50, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Llez (talk) 13:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
Oppose -- unnatural colours, sharpness, overprocessed. A very good photo, but for an "excellent" everything really has to fit. Je-str (talk) 14:45, 6 May 2022 (UTC)- Support--Famberhorst (talk) 15:38, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose Great shot but it needs a rework: 1) more realistic colors 2) perspective correction (both sides are leaning out) 3) CA removal. If those issues are fixed I'd support Poco a poco (talk) 16:51, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support I think we have gone too far in the direction of anti-500px. The colors are appropriate for the scene IMO. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 21:22, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support I think the colors are well-represented here for a sunrise in autumn. Great subject too. --Rohieb (talk) 22:15, 6 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support --Yann (talk) 12:39, 7 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per Je-str. --A.Savin 02:45, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support Colours a little overdone for my taste but not insane. Minor technical faults don't outweigh an outstandingly beautiful composition Cmao20 (talk) 07:57, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Support--Agnes Monkelbaan (talk) 09:26, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Regretful oppose per others; technical flaws (very apparent at lower left). Daniel Case (talk) 15:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose because of mentioned technical issues. --Basotxerri (talk) 15:54, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose per others --Uoaei1 (talk) 18:19, 8 May 2022 (UTC)
Confirmed results:
Result: 10 support, 6 oppose, 0 neutral → not featured. /--A.Savin 00:16, 15 May 2022 (UTC)
