Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stefan Nemanja monument (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

File:Stefan Nemanja monument (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2022 at 11:16:03 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Stefan Nemanja monument (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Stefan Nemanja monument (Belgrade, Serbia).jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Objects/Sculptures#Statues outdoors
•  Info Stefan Nemanja monument by night (Belgrade, Serbia). My photo. -- Mile (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Mile (talk) 11:16, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose No wow (limited artistic value of the sculpture to me; might be matter of taste though), suboptimal light (overexposed highlights; HDR might have helped or just choose Blue hour for taking the photo), distorted perspective. The correct FP gallery I've changed for you (you're welcome). --A.Savin 12:05, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Info A.Savin you were too quick. Nothing is overexposed, and this is HDR. Distorted perspective, thats normal for 10 mm and aiming at angle. Would you like building to be paralel ? Be serious. --Mile (talk) 17:47, 8 September 2022 (UTC)

  Nothing is overexposed? Open in Photoshop & look at histogram, I would say. --A.Savin 03:25, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

  What is "overexposed" for you ? Normaly this means color code in RGB (255,255,255) or #ffffff in Hexadecinal. I could not find one pixel ot blown color. --Mile (talk) 11:47, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

  @Mile, just to clarify: you're mixing up two related but different concepts here. An image can be over-exposed (i.e. subjectively perceived as "too bright") without a single pixel clipping. An image can also have even large areas of plain white without being perceived as over-exposed (e.g. in high-key photography). El Grafo (talk) 09:58, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

•  Support Flip side: Interesting monument to me, colossal and very sharp, with significant glare in only one area: the cross, which arguably benefits metaphorically from being resplendent. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:56, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose Per Savin. Very badly handled HDR with an important feature mostly white clipped. And if the result is bad with a wide angle lens, just use a longer focal and step back. Not like there's no room to. I don't like the very black sky either. - Benh (talk) 09:54, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Support -- Karelj (talk) 12:02, 9 September 2022 (UTC)
•  Oppose per others. I can see what you might have been thinking but it just didn't work. Daniel Case (talk) 04:12, 12 September 2022 (UTC)
•  I withdraw my nomination --Mile (talk) 09:30, 16 September 2022 (UTC)