Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg

File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg, featured

Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes.Voting period ends on 17 Sep 2023 at 07:01:23 (UTC)
Visit the nomination page to add or modify image notes.

Featured picture candidates/File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg Commons:Featured picture candidates/File:Náměstí Zachariáše z Hradce in the fog.jpg

• Gallery: Commons:Featured pictures/Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Czech_Republic
•  Info all by Pudelek -- Pudelek (talk) 07:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support -- Pudelek (talk) 07:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Blown sun. --SHB2000 (talk) 10:51, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support - ABAL1412^{🇻🇳🇸🇺🇷🇺} (talk ☭) 16:22, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low quality for FP, IHMO. -- Karelj (talk) 18:01, 8 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support: lovely atmosphere --The Cosmonaut (talk) 23:20, 9 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support --MZaplotnik^(talk) 14:11, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Terrible lighting, and blurry. 20 upper 19:30, 10 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support More of the sun is in the picture than I would prefer, but it's clearly Pudelek's intention to emphasize the sun beating down through the fog, and the photo succeeds in doing what he intended. And I like the fogscape. To address some of the critics: Of course the sun is blown! On what setting would the sun not be blown, and why indeed shouldn't it be blown? And of course the photo is blurry! Everyone knows that fog blurs - that's the point! As for the light, it is what it is, and showing it this way is the photographer's intention. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 03:04, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan, exactly. --Aristeas (talk) 05:59, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support (⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)Anna.Massini(⧼Anna Massini alias PROPOLI87⧽) (talk) 08:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support per Ikan. ZandDev (talk) 10:03, 12 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Neutral I get what the photographer was going for, and he certainly achieved it. But does that make it an FP? Not so sure. My main issue is that it's not especially useful as an illustration of the place or any of the buildings (relevant if it is to be placed in the Architecture gallery). BigDom (talk) 12:09, 12 September 2023 sing(UTC)

• That might be a reason to place it in a natural phenomena gallery (or whatever it's called). It doesn't seem like a sound basis for having doubts about whether to feature or not. -- Ikan Kekek (talk) 17:07, 12 September 2023 (UTC)

• Pudelek, BigDom, Ikan Kekek, I've taken the liberty of placing this in the 'Cityscapes' gallery. You can't see any Architecture in the image, but a Cityscape in fog is still a cityscape. True, it could fit in 'Fog' if the nominator would prefer that, but I think Cityscapes is a good compromise. --Cart (talk) 12:33, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

•  Support -- Radomianin (talk) 05:28, 13 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Support ★ 19:13, 14 September 2023 (UTC)
•  Oppose Low quality for FP. ~Moheen ^{(keep talking)} 14:28, 16 September 2023 (UTC)

Confirmed results:

Result: 10 support, 4 oppose, 1 neutral → featured. /-- Radomianin (talk) 07:15, 18 September 2023 (UTC)

This image will be added to the FP gallery: Places/Architecture/Cityscapes#Czech_Republic